rispondi a questa domanda

Crash Bandicoot Domanda

Are the new Crash Bandicoot games really THAT bad?

All this ranting about the new Crash Bandicoot games being "bad" is driving crazy! The reason why there hasn't been a single new Crash game in forever is because of how everyone makes these annoyingly and obnoxiously criticisms about EVERY SINGLE new Crash game that comes out. It seems as though the new companies that make the new Crash games just can't seem to get it right with being good. So what? The haters rather have their preferito video game stella, star of all time be left out in the dark instead of having to make a come back in the new and better consoles? Who cares? Why can’t anyone just give them a chance?
 sMCCarthyTV posted più di un anno fa
next question »

Crash Bandicoot Risposte

slaywat said:
First of all, the reason why there hasnt been a Crash game in ages is because of Activision. Jason Rubin (the co-creator of Crash bandicoot) made clear on Twitter he wanted to do stuff with Crash the past years so much and asked Activision to do so, but has been rejected many times. Since Activision is.. te know, Activision we can assume that they are afraid they won't get any money. And yes the latest Crash games are actually either bad o bland. The wrath of Cortex was obviously something to just please fans, it had nothing new o special unlike the precedente ones. Nitro Kart was bad compared to team racing, since CTR has one of the best kart racer mechanics to date. Twinsanity however was good and actually well received on fans, it was new, intresting, unique, too bad it was rushed though and received bad reviews on magazines. The GBA games were also well received, along with Crash Bash. And now the titans, oh god. First of all, even the two creators of Crash hated it, even they hated it along with most other games because those other games didnt follow the path of how a Crash bandicoot should be like. Crash of the titans was just plain bad, it wasnt even a 3D platformer, something Crash bandicoot is supposed to be like. It had combat, in fact bad combat. The Scrivere was god awful, the character modelle were just plain bad (dr.Cortex being a terrorist and Coco being a everyday teen girl, oh and dont let me get started on Tiny tiger) like litterly every single thing about it was bad. Sure it was a little bit fun to play as a titan o shit, but that isnt what a Crash Bandicoot game should be about, the fun must come from jumping, in 3D. And its not like nobody gave the developers a chance, so many people loved Twinsanity as fuck. What youre doing now is the kind of reaction of DmC. No people dont hate DmC because of the black hair, but because of the simple-made combat, the bad writing(heyhey), turning the characters to shit(heyhey). And te know why people want a new Crash game only made da Naughty Dog? Because they actually care for Crash, they know what his gameplay is supposed to be like, along with art-style, personality,music, everything. Sure the 2010 Crash Bandicoot cancelled game looked like it could recapture that, but then they cancelled it.
select as best answer
posted più di un anno fa 
JJgamer96 said:
For starters, just criticizing the games isn't killing the Crash. secondo the main reason the later games are criticized so much is because of their unnecessary redesign, and change in about everything. To be a fan of a videogame series there are two main factors te must like "The characters", and for the Crash series "The humor" and "The gameplay/levels", and Crash of the Titans is completely different from the past games, theres kinda no reason we should like these games. fan had rather see Crash like how they fell in Amore with the series, rather than as the opposite.
select as best answer
posted più di un anno fa 
next question »