How come the fact that the Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. sparkle is annoying everyone?

it doesnt bother me in the least.I happen to Amore Twilight and i am a Twi-Hard and proud of it.I wear it like a badge of honor.I happen to Amore sparkly vampires,especially if their name is Cullen,especially Edward.Yes,I am also a Team Edward fan and am even più proud to be a member of that club too.If te think I am a teenage girl te are wrong,because Twilight isn't just for teenage girls.That isn't Edward's sparkly skin te see in the sunlight,that is his soul that te see and if te ask me that just makes him all the più beautiful.His inner beauty coupled with his outer beauty truly makes him sparkle.

It doesn't really matter whether he sparkles o not.Its what's inside that really counts.99 % of all Team Edward girls were drawn to Edward because of his charm,sensitivity,and chivalry.He was very vecchio stile and gentle-man-like.Something that te don't really see much today.

Well I on one hand don't find anything really bad about it since Edward to me is just a negative character who I never really liked.
On to the domanda i think others hated it because Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. used to be known as fierce blood sucking murders who were sensual and just bad culo i.e Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. like in Angel, o Buffy the vampire Slayer, aand the anne riso vamps and a lot of fan of the classic vampire genre where insulted that she kinda degraded the awesomness of the vampire and instead of making them combust into flames in the sun she made them glitter which according to some opinions i have seen makes people see the Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. as pansies and just lame due to the fact the sparkle.
I think a lot of classic vampire fan were just insulted at what meyer turned the vampire genre into.

I just can't take the sparkles seriously. It reminds me of the arcobaleno Magic libri I used to read when I was a kid.

I might've actually liked twilight somewhat if the Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. didn't sparkle like giant fairy boys.

Well, think about it. Before Twilight, Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. are supposed to be like half bat and half person, right? So, whenever people think about them going out into the sunlight, they would think they'd burn. Sparkling bodies is usually how to describe a fairy. Of course that's going to annoy people. I mean, a sparkling vampire? Wow, that would sound unrealistic with the fact that Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. are just supposed to burn in the sun instead of sparkling. Like, didn't te think the same thing would happen before Twilight came out? I don't know if this risposte your domanda but hopefully it will.

Meyers basically ruined Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. in a sense. Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. are supposed to be turned to ash when they step out in the sunlight. fate normally are the ones who sparkle and then theres the fact that Meyers makes her Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. hard to kill. Then there is how she makes them from blood-sucking murderers to...basically what Edward Cullen is. A human loving,stalkerish,sparkly vampire who should have been a fairy instead.

It's because it makes it even più different to the classical vampire image; it literally means Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. don't have a physical weakness. After all, if they're seen sparkling, they can just kill the humans who saw and sposta to a different place o country. Although it's good to be original, a lot of people (including myself) feel that twilight Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. aren't vampires. They don't burn in the sun, they don't not like holy water o Bibles, they don't seem to be allergic to silver (at least it isn't mentioned in the series, I think; I admit I didn't exactly reread Twilight), and they can't be killed with a stake through the heart. Their only weakness is sparkling, which isn't vampire-like, making them hardly Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. at all, and isn't really a weakness at all.

As well as making Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. annoying Gary-Stuish, it's seen as very shallow: as in, oh, of course even vamps supposed weakness makes them handsome and beautiful. Please don't attack me for saying this, te asked why people hate sparkling, and I answered. It's not a weakness, shallow, and kind of lame.

Oh, and it's seen as gay for boys to sparkle. I don't like that argument, but lots of people think that.

There is sense in why Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. burn in sun:
It's becoz they are unholy creature and they cheat natural process of human life so nature found a way to go against them
The logic Meyer came with her sparkling Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. was very stupid:
She detto that they have diamond like reflective cells in their body that reflect (sparkle) when they come under direct sunlight but a reflective surface will reflect in whatever light it comes under and it need not be sunlight only so there is actually no logic in what Meyer said.
Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. are negative characters and though now they seem to have become Heroes of many major Supernatural fiction peple still prefer them in anti-hero role than being all sugary sweet and human

it doesn't bother me in the least,infact it makes them even più extraordinary