Harry Potter vs Twilight Domanda
Which series had the better last book AND WHY??
I know i added this as a pick but te need to write why te think its better.
Risposte
|
November99 said:
Harry Potter. Why? Because it had plenty of action, death, and an actual battle. Breaking Dawn I didn't read, but my friend did fill me in on it, and that book just creeps me out. No need to go into detail.
|
|
|
ybet_cullen18 said:
breaking dawn, because it has a romantic ending. And i like it when Aro allowed Nessie to live,.. and stephenie meyer is better than jk rowling!
|
|
|
zhanar said:
Harry Potter's last book was so mush better, it was emotional and had a lot of action in it, I was almost crying when Bellatrix started tourchring Hermione and Ron Lost it there, it shows that he would die for her and do anything, and the book was real, it had death and tears and some minor cursing =)
|
|
|
illo said:
I have been a humongous fan of both the libri until i read their last instalments & honestly the last libri ruined everthing for the series. But if i have to chose one than i guess Deathly hallows was less damaging than breaking dawn.The later really was a disaster i.e in my opinion.
|
|
|
1-2vampire said:
Harry Potter. Cos OMG my mind boggles at how Rowling has stitched it all together! How can she do that??? It all comes together like the puzzle pieces falling into place. OMG! HP ROXXX! xxx
|
|
|
Bookaholics said:
To be fair, I would actually have to say Breaking Dawn. Now I'm obviously biased for Harry Potter, as I think it's a better series, but I'm not comparing the two libri to each other, but to the rest of the series. Breaking Dawn was about the same as the other Twilight books,it was actually somewhat better written, and while I enjoyed DH a lot, I thought the other Harry Potter libri were better. I do think DH was brilliantly plotted, but the beginning WAS draggy.
|
|
|
itachifan1 said:
#1 edward and bella have a baby #2 they get married #3 it tells all abot renesmee growing up #4 it tell about the voltiri going after her
|
|
|
aurora30 said:
Ok whoa! I Amore Harry Potter. Shit. Harry Potter and Jk Rowling are the reasons why I even pick up other books. The whole HP series is over-whelming. I mean I never got tired of Leggere them. I would just finish one and sposta on to the successivo without ever getting bored. JK even made them last 7! and not jus 7 short stories like the Marked series of Vampire Diaries.((Oh dnt get me wrong I Amore both series)) But 7! 400 o più pages average. AT Least! But Meyers took the vampire style to a whole new genre. She on another level whn it comes to the Cullens. And I Amore her libri for the new perspective. SO many series since have taken wat she has done and fabricated it to the other series we all kno and love. ((Mentioned them earlier and then some...etc)) SO while I kno Jk Rowling is the better author. And I owe my Amore of libri to HP I do appreciate Twilight series as I do any other.
|
|
|
duckey94 said:
Harry Potter. 1: The entire plot of the story did not completely contradict statements previously made da the author. 2: The plot made sense. AND it completed the main plot of the entire series. Twilight couldn't do this because there was no plot for the entire series. 3: The last scene at the end of Twilight was the most anti-climatic thing i've ever read. Meyer was just trying to push a ridiculous, unbelievable, uninteresting happy ending. J.K. actually had an epic battle, deaths, injuries, tears, SUSPENSE. I know we all hated that those characters had to die, but it made for good literature. Breaking Dawn did not. 4: There were no pedophiles that I can immediately recall in Deathly Hallows. NUFF SAID.
|
|
|
Free_Spirit said:
HARRY POTTER. Twilight but each book is basically the same plot, Bella puts everyone in danger and then they all fix it and live happily ever after. HArry Potter is much più interesting. It is realistic, with the death, the suspense. It shows that life isn't always going to turn out happy. Also it shows the development of all the characters, and some of them change, in Twilight everyone is the same. I still Amore the Twilight series but i think it can sometimes give a bad message, not intentionally though. Like in breaking Dawn how Bella is ready to kill herself for a child, that can be a good and bad message. All in all both great series, but Harry Potter is probably better.
|
|
|
ravenclaweagle said:
Harry, of course! Hermione and Ginny aren't teen mothers, Harry doesn't "talk his problems out" with Voldemort (because how lame is that?), and it keeps te wondering and your cuore racing until the last page.
|
|
|
Volturrimort said:
Deathly Hallows, of course! It's a masterpiece, no doubt. After Leggere DH i can't help but read from Book 1 all over again. Everything makes sense. JKR raised my standards to the roof! As for Breaking Dawn, i cursed SM for wasting my freaking time!
|
|
|
greekgoddess525 said:
Harry Potter had the Better last book because j.k. Rowling is a better writer than Stephanie Meyer because she has had più experience because Harry potter has 7 books. Breaking Dawn was good but The Deathly Hallows was really good
|
|
|
KateKicksAss said:
I think this is kind of an unfair domanda to ask. Obviously, people are going to go for the book in whichever series they're a fan of.
|
|
|
avrilsmylife said:
Both last libri were my fave in both series but in my opinion breaking dawn because it's più what I'm into but I also Amore the last Harry potter
|
|