First of all I have to admit that I initially liked the twilight. The first movie I mean, it was pretty entertaining. Then I saw new moon and eclipse, hated both these films. The character I started to like initially were spoiled in thFor example ever since Edward’s suicide attempt in new moon and Jacob’s begging for Bella’s love, I despised both those characters.
Okay here is the deal.
Breaking was a hope that there will be some improvement in the saga, especially in terms of direction and acting. My Friends told me that the movie breaking dawn was great and that they felt like crying at the end and all. I thought, okay give it a shot. But no, it was much much much worse.
I saw Harry Potter and the deathly hallows before that of course. I liked it even though many subplots from the book were missing.
Here are the reasons why I hated breaking dawn movie and why Harry Potter and the deathly hallows was a lot better.

1.    Plot. (Spoilers)
Harry Potter drags in più suspense. It is the last movie and all the stories and subplots will be revealed and therefore completed in this last film. But above all that, this movie is about war and the ultimate fight between the good and evil and how the good side ultimately won. When te watch this Harry Potter film, te don’t focus on how handsome Harry, Ron o Draco was o how beautiful Hermione looked. te just want what will happen successivo in the story line. It is the profound matter in this franchise.
Breaking dawn on the other hand is all about a girl’s marriage with a boy she loves. Her ex boyfriend mourns over this. She gets pregnant and almost dies while giving birth. That’s all.
Harry Potter was cut into two parts just because the book was so broad and the whole thing cannot be contained in a three ora film. Breaking dawn was cut into two parts because they wanted to highlight the honeymoon scenes and stuff. Even though the book appears large, it actually doesn’t have a bigger plot than Goblet of fire. They have managed to convert Goblet of fuoco into a two ora film without much loss in storyline. The purpose was the billion dollar deal I guess. This film badly highlights lust più than love, importance of a companion than friendship o Amore etc. (Breaking part 2 is yet to come; I don’t think I have the capacity to see it. It may be better than the precedente twilight films o worse than the others.)

2.    Love in both the films/novels
As I have mentioned before the twilight saga badly promotes the lust behind love. Imprinting itself is an example for it. Imprinting is a mutual attraction between a guy and gal and all the others including Cibo and gravity don’t matter to you.
In my opinion, that is seriously sick. How can a guy matter to a girl più than everything else?
Edward and Bella’s relationship first of all. Their relationship is based on obsession. Bella left her entire family for him. She doesn’t care about her other friends. Don’t bring her friendship with Jacob into this. She wanted to see Jacob in eclipse and breaking dawn because she claims that he is her friend, no, she loves him and wants to be with him, it is pretty. fan claim that it was because she was pregnant with Renesmee and it was Renesmee responding at that time. But no, what about in Eclipse? Bella badly wanted to see him and even kisses him on the mountaintop. She loved him and wanted him. One guy is not enough for eh?
Tell me guys and gals.. is this love?
In Harry Potter various better and più realistic forms of Amore is shown. Not just the physical relationships in the twilight saga.
For example..
Harry and Hermione, Their Amore is purely in form of friendship. They Amore each other like brother and sister. They clearly proved that boys and girls can be friends. Hermione is ready to die for Harry. She was ready to sacrifice her precious time and life for him. Harry also would do vice versa for her. Friendship and commitment is what Harry is famous for. This is a lot better relationship than the one Edward and Bella has. Harry at least never tried to seduce Hermione like Jacob did in Eclipse. Jacob later falls in Amore with Renesmee that is where Pedophilia steps in.
Then parental love,
I am not mentioning just James and Lily, but also Molly Weasley who also loved Harry and Hermione as much as her own children.
Bella:”i have to figure out what to tell people why they will never see me again”
Edward: “After a few decades everyone te Amore will be dead, problem resolved”
Harry says a quote in order of the phoenix “You will never know Amore o friendship”
Amore has many forms indeed.
That one quote contradicts the quote of Bella and Edward in Eclipse
Speaking of the strength of Amore in both the franchise...
Edward’s immense good look managed to win Bella’s cuore and thus separate her from her family forever.
Bella’s Amore for both Edward and Jacob put them both in a dibattito on who will get her. And ultimately it broke either of their feelings. The problem was she expressed her Amore for Jacob and later detto that she loves Edward more. How lame. If she was quiet and told Jacob that she hates him, I am, sure that Jacob will be able to get over it.
Edward’s Amore for Bella was such that he can’t live without her. When he heard that she was dead, he tried to kill himself, a dead man trying to kill him selves. If he really wasn’t able to live without her he should have killed himself the giorno he left her. But no, He waited for her, and finally ended up thinking that he Lost her and went for it. Again how lame.
Jacob’s Amore for Bella was so immense that he tried to commit suicide when overheard the conversation where Edward reveals that he is going to marry Bella. What stopped him from doind it?
A baciare from Bella.
Why did she baciare him?
Because she loved him. One guy is not enough for her.
Hermione could have stopped Ron from going similarly, but for her loyalty is più important than a partner.
The real strength of Amore was shown da Severus Snape in Harry Potter. He loved Lily Potter unconditionally without any cause. Even though James married her, there was no other person for him. His Amore for Lily changed him as a person forever. He was a death eater, on evil side but he started fighting for the good since Lily died. He spied for Dumbledore on Voldemort and the death eaters (the most dangerous job ever). He always protected and cared for Harry (Which is pretty obvious). He was indirectly taking revenge, as well as allowed and supported the good side. He could easily rejoin the death eaters when Voldemort returned, But he chose not (in the book deathly Hallows). That’s the strength of real Amore and nothing in twilight saga can beat that.

3.    Albus Severus Potter vs Renesmee Carlie Cullen
The names of Harry Potter’s son and Bella’s daughter.
Renesmee was derived from Bella and Edward’s mother’s names Renee and Esme. Carlie was from Carlisle and Charlie. Guess what all of them are living legends. Maybe other than Carlisle, the other three people haven’t done anything heroic (or have they). The combination of the names was cute. There is nothing much that I know about this girl Renesmee. Maybe she is a sweetheart o maybe she is as pathetic as Bella.
But the name Albus Severus Potter had più feel than Renesmee Carlie Cullen.
Harry’s son was named after Albus Dumbledore and Severus Snape, two professors and headmasters of Hogwarts. Both of them were heroic and important people in Harry’s life. Both of them died eventually when Harry was young, and he named his son so because he wanted remember them forever. Also maybe he wanted to see Dumbledore’s generosity and Snape’s Bravery in his son. Therefore the name had a great feel too.

4.    The trio
In Harry Potter we have Harry Potter a Ribelle - The Brave young man who is ready to any extent to save the world from evil. He is involved in saving people’s lives. Then there is Ron, an adorable but tough boy, who is ready to be with Harry in his journey. Then Hermione, one of the best female role modelle ever. She is clever, cute, and strong and her Amore and loyalty is incomparable.

In the twilight saga, there is Bella Swan, A weak, emo, selfish, manipulative, male dependent (both for protection and pleasure), evil , who can’t live a secondo without her Supernatural boyfriends and above all ,she has a serious personality disorder. There is Edward, who was pretty cool and charming initially, but turned out to be a complete jerk at the end of new moon when he tries to kill himself (not very romantic sweethearts). Then he is good at stalking girls (That’s what everyone says), he may not be abusive o anything, but he too lacks a personality like Bella. Finally Jacob Black (Before him there was a Sirius Black in Harry Potter) a boy who tried to seduce Bella against her will. That is a not ‘romantic’ dear girl that’s in fact a crime!!!!! He begs Bella to choose him, ewww, is that Amore o strength? What kind of greatness does he exhibit? Oh yes he was ready to fight for the girl. I won’t say that he is completely a bad guy because I did like him in twilight and half of new moon until he cut his hair. Because I felt that he hated the relationship between Edward and Bella, because Edward was a vampire and he was concerned about Bella as a friend. But no later on it revealed that he can’t live without her. Okay his Amore for Bella is natural, but why tey to persuade her to take a decision against her own will.


5.    Solid recitazione in Harry Potter.
The biggest drawback I found in all the twilight Film is how bad the recitazione is. Kristen Stewart is monotonous and hardly has any emotions. She plays Bella in all four Film just the same with open mouth, under toned voice and staring staring staring. The girl hardly has any great feelings.
Robert Pattinson was lively enough in twilight to make the Edward convincing but since new moon even he fell into the category of terrible actors. Edward he portrays is like a beautiful statue, yet most of the teenage girl loves to see him like that. Taylor Launtner performs as if he is lifting a heavy object, when it comes to anger and grief.
The supporting cast too is no great, Ashley greene is just a pretty face, so is Jackson Rathbone, Kellan Lutz, Elizabeth Reaser, Rachelle Lefevre, Peter Fascinelli, Dakota Fanning, Michael Sheen etc. It is because they have only so much importance and role to give their best (at least so far, it may improve in part 2). The whole movie is about Edward, Bella and Jacob and the others are just there. So in total the recitazione is a lot stale.
Harry Potter may seem a silly movie to many people but it has a very strong, that is solid recitazione from all the actors. I am not saying that Dniel, Rupert and Emma are great actors but they have managed to present the characters as impressive to the audience as possible. Daniel was steadfast but he seemed less impressive compared to others but he was definitely Harry. Rupert was the best among the three, he was very lively. He was funny, emotional, desperate, and tough at times. Can’t imagine a better Ron. Emma had a lot of flaws especially her eye brow raising in goblet of fuoco and order of the phoenix, but she improves from then on. The most impressive aspect about her performance was that she was different in all eight Harry Potter, both in terms of characterisation and style of acting. She started of as a kid in Philosopher’s stone to a matured teenage girl in deathly hallows. At the same she managed to stick the core of the character Hermione.
It is impossible to rule most of the supporting cast. The characters in Harry Potter are not just a ‘pretty faces’. There are kids like Tom Felton as Draco Malfoy, Bonnie Wright as Ginny Weasley etc and Great actors like Richard Harris/Michael Gambon as Dumbledore, Robbie Coltrane as Hagrid, Alan Rickman as Severus Snape, Maggie Smith as Minerva McGonagall, Helena Bonham Carter as Bellatrix Lestrange etc. This franchise succeeded in bringing out the depth behind these characters. The perfect and excellent performances from all the actors are enough to make a franchise look impressive especially to the pros. It made the films look realistic and therefore comparable with the books. Thus Harry Potter not just focuses on three people but also those around along with them.
Robert Pattinson performed better in Harry Potter, than in all four films of twilight. (Not everyone will agree with me in this case, it is just my opinion.)
Just take the Film Deathly Hallows and Breaking to compare the acting. In Breaking dawn it was just atrocious. No great talents o emotions were involved and I felt it was taken as if they were running out of time.
ese two films.

Therefore My opinion is that Harry Potter is anyday better than twilight.