Am I really narrow-minded?

Meyer wasn't Scrivere a horror novel, so she didn't make her Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. scary.

It is true that Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. don't exist. Saying that Dracula doesn't sparkle in the sun, so Twilight Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. shouldn't sparkle is also like saying Merlin didn't have any glowing scars, so Harry shouldn't either. There is no set concrete standards o criterion for things that do not exist.

I think it's true that many people can be più open minded in this aspect, but I do not believe they are narrow minded. I think being narrow minded would mean that they refuse to know absolutely anything about them other than what they prefer to assume.

No, I don't think you're being narrow-minded.

It's your opinion whether te like something o not, and te have reasons why. te stated your reasons (or some of your reasons) on why te "dislike" Twilight, and if she couldn't accept that, fine. No matter WHAT creature you're Scrivere about in a story, if they have a mind of their own, they need to have CHARACTER FLAWS, something Stephenie Meyer's Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. seriously lacked. (Nothing against Stephenie Meyer as a person, though!) Yes, te could say te COULD be a little narrow-minded about the whole sparkling thing in Twilight, and how the concept bothered you. But again, it's all a matter of opinion. If te don't like Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. that sparkle, that's your personal input on things. That doesn't making te any less creative - it just shows your likes and dislikes about your view of vampires.

But the fact about not liking Twilight itself, that's not narrow-minded. That's good sense. :)

No, Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. are supposed to be scary not sparkley

Warning: I May Sound A Bit Biased Because I Amore Twilight! However, I'm Rereading Harry Potter Because I Amore Those Too!

Anyway, I Think te Are Being Narrow-Minded With The Fact That Stephenie Meyer's Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. Didn't Meet Your Expectations! But It Is A Bit Out There! So Yes And No! It Has Nothing To Do With Your Imagination Though! Just Because te Don't Like Stephenie Meyer's Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. Doesn't Mean Your Imagination Isn't Good! Really It's Just Opinion! A Vampire Storie With The Frightning Gore That te Expect Them To Have, Compared To The Cullens. . . Yeah, I'll Admit It's Defenaitly Changed! te Could Be A Tad più Open Minded But It's Really Opinion!

Hope I Helped! :)

I doubt it. Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. can be portrayed differently due to different people's creativity, but te can't just change everything that makes a vampire a vampire. It's not being narrow minded, it's just reacting to a ridiuclous change. It's like if a certain aspect of your life that you're used to suddenly changes without explanation. True, a fictional creature has no rules that must be followed, but something that's been around for 100s of years, can't be that drastically altered da a writer, because it takes away what they are.

Certain mythologies go along with Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. - it's what makes them vampires. I've read other vampire novels where the autore tweaked some vampire myths to suit her own version of Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. (Amelia Atwater Rhodes is a perfect example) and not been bothered. However, those other Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. had flaws and weaknesses, something Smeyer's Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. don't have.

I consider myself to be a very open-minded and accepting person, but even I (even when I was a fan) wasn't happy about Smeyer's vampires.

No. You're not. The Cullens are not vampires- they are blehblehblehs.

(p.s. Is your mom a Twi-mom?)

No, not at all. Both me and my sister Astrid are antis and my cousin is a Twitard and she's always saying that I'm not open to a change in the vampire and werewolf rules. But what Meyer's doing isn't even changing the rules, it's almost like she's trying to redefine the rules, set da authors that have Scrivere skills (which she doesn't have).

Also, the Meyerpires aren't even Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. and the Meyer licantropi aren't even werewolves, they're just glittery, bloodsucking Ken/Barbie bambole and Animorphs, which aren't even worthy of being called Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. and werewolves.

No.