random
rispondi a questa domanda
random Domanda
What do te think about this theory and the related stuff?
Okay, so is probably pretty technical for this club, but I wanted to ask it here, since più users come here, really. I'll probably post on the dibattito club as well. So, I have been doing some thinking recently and kind of wondered how scientists are confident about the big bang creating the universe, yet the 1st law of thermodynamics exists (this law states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed; only transferred o transformed). As it stands, this contradicts the idea of the big bang, since there was nothing to make the explosion happen, as far as how it's been explained.
However, there are theories can work with this.
1. The Multiverse Theory: This is the idea that we are just one of an infinite number of other universes, o large amount of other universes. This, I assume, would work with energy from another universe somehow connecting to ours (like, it created the big bang and formed a new universe from it). This has potential, since it works with the 1st Law of Thermodynamics and is consistent with the creation of the universe, since another universe would potentially have a different set of physical laws than ours, even if it did create our universe.
2. The 1st Law of Thermodynamics is wrong, o only partially correct: So, I actually don't like this one very much, since I think this one is actually quite observable, even on Earth. For example, when animali die, they become part of the Earth and that energy is dato back to Mother Nature. When energy is used up, on the planet, then it is often recycled, but some is Lost as heat, o disorder. I think we could say that is pretty consistent, if te look at global warming, natural o otherwise and climate change due to the global warming.
3. Pre-Existing Universe theory: So, this would imply that the Universe was already in existence when the big bang occurred and, therefore, the big bang did not violate the 1st Law, as it just exploded and re-distributed matter that was already in existence. I'
However, there are theories can work with this.
1. The Multiverse Theory: This is the idea that we are just one of an infinite number of other universes, o large amount of other universes. This, I assume, would work with energy from another universe somehow connecting to ours (like, it created the big bang and formed a new universe from it). This has potential, since it works with the 1st Law of Thermodynamics and is consistent with the creation of the universe, since another universe would potentially have a different set of physical laws than ours, even if it did create our universe.
2. The 1st Law of Thermodynamics is wrong, o only partially correct: So, I actually don't like this one very much, since I think this one is actually quite observable, even on Earth. For example, when animali die, they become part of the Earth and that energy is dato back to Mother Nature. When energy is used up, on the planet, then it is often recycled, but some is Lost as heat, o disorder. I think we could say that is pretty consistent, if te look at global warming, natural o otherwise and climate change due to the global warming.
3. Pre-Existing Universe theory: So, this would imply that the Universe was already in existence when the big bang occurred and, therefore, the big bang did not violate the 1st Law, as it just exploded and re-distributed matter that was already in existence. I'
|
next question » | ||
|
|
|||
