Blood Drive (TV series)
add a link
Blood Drive: 4 Outlets That Should Consider Picking Up the Grindhouse Drama
Blood Drive: 4 Outlets That Should Consider Picking Up the Grindhouse Drama
According to Variety, the estimated cost of a broadcast/cable half-hour ranges between $1.5 million to somewhere over $3 million per episode, with high-end cable and streaming dramas creeping up to $5-$7 million per episode.
parole chiavi: blood drive, cancellation, analysis, other, network, pick up, possibilities, pros, cons
|
I remember visiting this website once...
It was called Blood Drive: Which Outlets Should Consider Picking It Up?
Here's some stuff I remembered seeing:
Blood Drive: 4 Outlets That Should Consider Picking Up the Grindhouse Drama
KSiteTV\'s Shilo Adams examines the pros and cons of four outlets that should consider picking up Blood Drive for a second season.
According to Variety, the estimated cost of a broadcast/cable half-hour ranges between $1.5 million to somewhere over $3 million per episode, with high-end cable and streaming dramas creeping up to $5-$7 million per episode. In the age of Peak TV and the continued fracturing of the television marketplace, one might assume that networks would be as cost efficient as possible, given that Live + Same Day ratings are (almost) uniformly down and non-linear measures are used to push a series toward profitability. However, costs have only risen in recent years as the amount of audience needed to sustain lavish productions simply is much rarer to achieve through live means.
by Syfy was such an interesting turn of events. The grindhouse thriller, a campy and goopy successor to
on acid, debuted this past summer to solid reviews and found itself with the type of loud (but small) cult audience that genre entertainment thrives on. Working in its favor was that it was fully owned by NBCUniversal (the same company that owns Syfy) and that its production budget was half of
, amounting to $1.4 million/episode, per a line in the show’s finale. However,
became a victim of (another) network rebrand, with Syfy leaning even harder on pre-sold IP and pandering ads spouting genre references, and found itself without a home earlier this month.
But considering how expensive it is to get into the world of original scripted content, and how difficult it can be for networks dipping their toe into those waters to get buzz, something like
can prove to be an asset for the right outlet. While shows being rescued from the cancellation grave still isn’t a common occurrence, there’s enough going on for
financially and socially to make it a prime candidate for resurrection. So who would benefit the most from taking a chance on what might be the most distinct scripted show of the TV year?
Pros: When looking strictly at the creative, easily the best place for
director Robert Rodriguez in 2013. Not only would Rodriguez find appreciation for and know how to market the only grindhouse scripted series on air, not only would he identify with the guerilla production methods that made
what it is, he would be able to garner mainstream buzz for El Rey through the acquisition of a cost effective, on-brand scripted series that the network hasn’t gotten in a while. Billing itself as the home of unfiltered, kick-ass entertainment, El Rey, with its combination of Mexican wrestling
ethos and would give the show a chance to exist without the Nielsens breathing down its neck.
would be the only active scripted series on the network, which would help it stand out and give it enough marketing resources to thrive, there’s the matter of whether El Rey even wants scripted right now.
was cancelled in November 2014 after failing to garner enough international interest, while
is stuck in a strange limbo where the cast is released from their contracts but a formal cancellation hasn’t been handed down. With a number of networks backing down from scripted content (e.g. A&E, MTV) and nothing scripted in the works at El Rey since
was put on ice, the network could very well content itself with reality/unscripted programming and acquired content, especially since it’s as yet unclear what their original content budget is and whether
‘s majorly discounted price-tag is that big of a deal.
is probably Hulu, which is owned in part by NBCUniversal, the same company that owns Universal Cable Productions – the company that produces Blood Drive. One thing that gets lost when fans try to rally for shows to be resurrected is that it’s much easier to move money within the same corporate umbrella than it is to move money from across umbrellas, so even if
‘s lack of expense (which is compounded by the fact that they could return only one series regular) and engaged fan base are assets to all suitors, the easiest moves are still within the NBCUniversal purview. With Universal Cable purported to be supportive of
, this would be the path of least resistance; for Hulu’s part, it would be inheriting more original content to further push back against Netflix’s domination of the television buzz cycle, hours that make financial sense for the greater NBCU good and hours that are pre-branded with awareness that can be hard to come by for new productions.
is very different from the typical Hulu show, as their only horror/sci-fi shows are high school freak show
doing well, there’s a history of fan bases flocking to Hulu to find their shows.
Cons: Hulu’s in an interesting position, where their scripted original brand is flourishing yet they’re still going heavily on acquisitions. They’re said to be spending a fraction of what Netflix and Amazon are regarding original programming despite their first taste of legitimacy in
, which walked away with eight Primetime Emmys including Outstanding Drama Series. By getting this validation from the television industry, becoming the first streamer to win a series Emmy in spite of a lower originals budget, Hulu could very well want to push further with shows they develop themselves vs. taking on projects from other platforms. They’re clearly going in the right direction regarding their approach to originals, so with that lower budget, they might want to allocate a greater proportion to furthering this newfound respect they’ve been given, especially since they’re not hurting for buzz as much these days. One of the risks in picking up shows from other networks is that you could be looked at as the Island of Misfit Television Shows rather than a place with a budget and brand of your own, so if Hulu wants to get involved with
(which currently isn’t available to stream there) but doesn’t want to absorb it into the fold like it did with
Pros: The network soon-to-be-formerly-known-as-Spike only recently dipped its toes back into the scripted waters with
, a modestly rated Stephen King adaptation, and MTV cast off
, both of which are moderately budgeted genre shows that fit well with
. As much as networks who rebrand want to live and die by their own hand, lest their success be credited to a platform other than their own, what any new brand needs more than anything is buzz, to get people talking about them one way or another. In lieu of a big acquisition deal that focuses on syndication properties or movies, the next best thing is to find a wayward show with an audience that matches your own and an engaged audience that you’d be luring to your network. With Paramount looking to become a prime scripted hub for Viacom thanks to its international reach, they might have to cut a corner or two in order to achieve a certain number of original hours without breaking the bank and something like
Cons: Judging from its initial programming slate, Paramount looks to be going for a catch-all USA Network-type vibe rather than the genre-friendly hub that Spike was becoming. With
, if they want to renew a lower-rated genre show, they could go with (essentially) in-house drama
, and if they’re going for a broader, more general brand, something as specific and niche as
might not make as much sense. Plus, there’s the matter of financial ego, as a network trying to build a new brand isn’t going to want one of their first big moves to be acquiring a lower-rated show from a competitor. Though
‘s lower numbers look better due to expense, or lack thereof, it’s not produced by a company related to Viacom and therefore might be too much of a reach, even if Paramount were interested.
, Netflix isn’t afraid of shows with a very specific audience, nor does it back down from shows that can challenge and alienate some of its subscribers. Given it’s tremendous reach and lack of public ratings, it can program toward passionate audiences and use its marketing muscle and brand loyalty to get shows sampled that wouldn’t be touched elsewhere. With
having a subject and sensibility that might not appeal to everyone, going to a platform that supports its craziness and doesn’t have to worry about Nielsen makes sense, especially since the show has already premiered internationally, making a subsequent transfer to a Netflix original less abrupt, and Netflix has distributed UCP shows internationally before. Netflix hasn’t been shy about saving shows in the past (see:
is a cost effective sci-fi/horror/action show (see: the fact that an entire season of
could be made for the money it took to create three
season two episodes), it fills a niche in their brand while not straining an already winded content budget any more than it has to.
Cons: The last time Netflix saved an outright cancelled show vs. outbidding another outlet for something whose rights were up (
), or taking over production for another side that opted out (
in 2015. The platform seems much more engaged with producing its own originals than in becoming a place that regularly rescues shows in need, even with a ballooning content budget and a string of recent homegrown cancellations. Though
has generated a fair amount of buzz, moreso concentrated among its cult core, it might not have enough power behind it to get Netflix to pay attention.
on Syfy’s website, the Syfy app, Amazon, iTunes, Google Play, Vudu, and select VOD outlets.
Sun, Streams, and DVDs: What You Can Catch Up On This Summer
Shilo Adams is a contributor to KSiteTV who has written for the likes of TVOvermind, ScreenFad, and TVHackr. You can e-mail him at sda2107@gmail.com or follow him on Twitter @sda0918.
Supernatural Season 13 Premiere Photos: “Lost and Found” Hot
Lucifer Season 3 Premiere & Cast Gallery Photos with Tom Welling! Hot
Riverdale Season 2 Premiere Photos: “A Kiss Before Dying” Hot
This Year’s DC Superhero Crossover Is “Crisis On Earth X” Hot
First Look Video: Tom Welling in Lucifer Season 3 Hot
Once Upon A Time Season 7 Cast Photos Released By ABC
Russell Tovey Is Gay Hero The Ray In This Year’s DC Crossover
What’s On TV Tonight – Thursday, September 28th, 2017
Photos: Daniel Henney Joins Criminal Minds In “Wheels Up”
SEAL Team: David Boreanaz Discusses His New Character
Candice King Shares A Photo From The Originals’ Klaroline Reunion
Riverdale Spoilers: “Chapter Fifteen: Nighthawks” Description
Lucifer #3.3 Spoilers: “Mr. & Mrs. Mazikeen Smith”
For the People: Britt Robertson Lands Lead in Recasting
Black Lightning: The CW Releases A Longer Synopsis and Trailer
The CW 2017-2018 Schedule: Valor & Dynasty Premiere, Arrow Moves
Arrow Space Channel Promo Contains New Clips
Stephen Amell Names His Favorite Arrow Co-Star To Film With
read more
accedi o registrati a fanpop per aggiungere il tuo commento