Dear Frozen,
Thank you. Thank te for being pretty much the only realistic portrayal of Amore in mainstream media in the last- oh, I don’t know- at least five years.
Thank te for mostrare that Hans, the handsome gallant prince of the Southern Isles who seemed a perfect match for Anna is fallible. Thank te for mostrare that the idea of a “one perfect match” isn’t necessarily realistic. Thank te for mostrare us that Amore is like with Kristoff, how everyone has their rough edges, how no one can fit the mold of perfection. Thank te for reminding us that “everyone’s a bit of a fixer-upper, that’s what it’s all about!” And, especially, thank te for saying clearly that “people don’t really change.” Thank te for being so clear in that Amore is about accepting people, especially their flaws, and not finding someone who fits an ideal.
But most of all, thank you, Olaf, for giving pretty much the only sane definition of Amore any media has dato in too, too long. Thank te for telling us “Love is putting someone else’s needs before yours” in an age of “The best Amore of all is loving yourself,” “You have to Amore yourself before te can Amore others,” and “You have to provide for yourself before te can provide for someone else.” Thank te for reminding us that Amore is selfless. Thank te for the fact that little boys and girls will watch Frozen and hear that Amore is about consciously making someone else più important and not about making sure you’re fulfilled above all else. Thank te for the truth te gave us that the world has tried so hard to deny. Thank te for reminding us that Amore is, above all, sacrifice.
Thank you. Thank te for being pretty much the only realistic portrayal of Amore in mainstream media in the last- oh, I don’t know- at least five years.
Thank te for mostrare that Hans, the handsome gallant prince of the Southern Isles who seemed a perfect match for Anna is fallible. Thank te for mostrare that the idea of a “one perfect match” isn’t necessarily realistic. Thank te for mostrare us that Amore is like with Kristoff, how everyone has their rough edges, how no one can fit the mold of perfection. Thank te for reminding us that “everyone’s a bit of a fixer-upper, that’s what it’s all about!” And, especially, thank te for saying clearly that “people don’t really change.” Thank te for being so clear in that Amore is about accepting people, especially their flaws, and not finding someone who fits an ideal.
But most of all, thank you, Olaf, for giving pretty much the only sane definition of Amore any media has dato in too, too long. Thank te for telling us “Love is putting someone else’s needs before yours” in an age of “The best Amore of all is loving yourself,” “You have to Amore yourself before te can Amore others,” and “You have to provide for yourself before te can provide for someone else.” Thank te for reminding us that Amore is selfless. Thank te for the fact that little boys and girls will watch Frozen and hear that Amore is about consciously making someone else più important and not about making sure you’re fulfilled above all else. Thank te for the truth te gave us that the world has tried so hard to deny. Thank te for reminding us that Amore is, above all, sacrifice.
They Should Make It!
Since Don Bluth had done it back in 1997, Disney should do it. In this version, they would make her mother Alexandra Fyodorovna along with Rasputin the main antagonists with the latter brainwashing the latter, prompting mother and daughter to be estranged o however the relationship should be. It wasn't until the final scene that Alexandra came to her senses!
They Should Not Make It!
I personally think that should not make it, because if they make Rasputin as the bad guy again. The story will be so familiar with the 1997 version! Unless they change the story and choose a brand new antagonists for the film.
An Imperial Moment
So, what do te think? Should Disney really make it o not?