This section of my guide for fanpop users details the ratings system and was last edited on 26 May 2008.

As with any web site, fanpop is only as good as its content. Some content - what I think of as the soul of the site - is generated da users in the fora and in commenti on the rest of the content and cannot be rated. But the rest of the content - the body of the site - has a ratings system. The whole principle of the ratings system is a democratic one: if enough people vote, the really qualified items rise to the top. That's why everything that can be rated can be sorted in a lista from highest to lowest ratings, so that te o anyone else can see the good stuff first.

The importance of rating
Rating is voluntary. However, there are four reasons to rate content:

1) Rated content makes fanpop work. fanpop is organized around spots, and spots can contain a lot of content related to the spot's topic. Every spot has the ability to sort its content in a number of ways, including "highest rated". As più content is added to a spot, the più important it is for someone coming to that spot to be able to perform that "highest rated" sort on the content, particularly for new fan just starting out to discover a new topic. If there's no way to distinguish between all the content in a spot without looking at it all piece da piece, the site becomes mostly pointless. You'd do as well sticking to a cerca catalog like Google o Yahoo if te have to sift through a long lista to find the good stuff. Ratings are integral to the value of the site.

2) Bad content get suppressed. This is the flip side of the coin; since good content gets promoted, bad content drops further and further down the lists sorted da "highest rated". This saves people from seeing something really awful right off the bat, and reduces the chance that a new user checking out a spot for the first time will turn away from the spot in disgust because of a few experiences with bad content.

3) Users get recognized. As più people rate the content on the site, those who post the content that gets good ratings will gradually earn medaglie for their contributions. This is Fanpop's way of encouraging good participation in a spot. We, as users, define what is good in that precedente sentence, simply da our ratings. When we rate something highly, not only is the user who postato it that much closer to getting a medal, but più importantly, that user knows that someone on the site appreciated what they've posted.

Similarly, those who post content that gets bad ratings can use those ratings as a guideline for their future submissions: "people didn't like that, so let's try something different with the successivo submission". Without giving poor content a low rating, the user who postato the content can't get the message and will have no reason to try something different successivo time.

4) You get recognized. fanpop keeps a tally of how many ratings you've given, listed on your profilo page. Every time te rate, that number goes up, demonstrating to the fanpop community that te are participating in making the site work.

What to rate
So, the domanda may come: what should one rate? Well, first of all, there are certain types of content that can be rated on fanpop (others cannot). The following types of content can be rated:
* links
* videos
* soapbox articles
* images

The following cannot be rated:
* spots
* picks
* forum threads
* forum posts
* news
* fans

successivo one should consider what sorts of things to rate. Usually, one rates on the quality of the content alone. This is fine as long as the content works in the spot in which it is found. If there is a problem - a non aesthetic problem - with the content, it almost certainly should be reported, and not rated. See the link for my più detailed explanation of reporting.

How to rate
So, you've found something that works for the spot in which it is found, te have a reaction to it - positive o negative - then te should rate it. How do te do that?


Each of the types of content te may rate - links, videos, soapbox articoli and immagini - have a band of five stars with a legend "You rated:" above it. If you've already rated this particular content item, it will mostra the rating te submitted. If te haven't, it will mostra the circles as grey outlines, with "rate this link" superimposed.

Whether you've rated a link already o not, te can rate it (with one exception - see below). To rate, click on the stella, star that represents the rating you'd like to give the content. The stars rank in increasing order from left to right, so if te wanted to rate the content three stars, you'd click the middle star, while two stars would be the secondo stella, star from the left, and four stars would be the fourth stella, star from the left.

What do the ratings mean, though? The five stars are explained in the link, but I'll go into più detail here:

One stella, star indicates that te think the content is garbage. It's offensive not because it violates any of the terms of service o is miscategorized, but because te feel it has no intrinsic value.
Two stars indicates that te think the content is blah, uninteresting, sub-standard and/or mediocre.
Three stars indicates that te think that the content is OK. This covers a broad range from "I think it's appropriate to the spot, pretty standard content" to "I think it's pretty good".
Four stars indicates that te think the content is great. It's superior to the usual content te find in the spot, and you're impressed da it. You're likely to save this content to your favorites.
Five stars indicates that te think the content is EXCELLENT. It's the best content it could possibly be. Not only do te save this content to your favorites, but te commento favorably on the content, give props to the user who postato the content, and share the link with all your friends, all because te can't help it - it's that good.

Note: The only kind of link te cannot rate (of the four types that are possible to rate) are links that te inviato to the site yourself.

You can't rate your own content!

Such content will still mostra te the aggregated ratings from all the other users who've rated it, but where te would normally be able to rate, the five circles are grey.

Common ratings etiquette
While te are not required to do anything with regards to rating, there are a couple of basic etiquette points to consider when rating.

First, be consistent. Determine how te are going to approach ratings and apply those criteria consistently across the site.

Second, explain ratings of a 1 o a 5. If te rate content a 1 o a 5, etiquette insists that te should always provide commenti explaining why it's garbage o why it's awesome, respectively. Without such feedback, the user who postato it (as well as other fanpop users looking at the same content) won't know what it is about the content that they should avoid o try to recreate in future postings. Then they have to guess, and when users have to guess what to do to please you, they're very likely to get it wrong. It becomes like rolling the dice and hoping for double sixes: extreme ratings result in blind gambling if te don't provide comments.

Recommendations for ratings
As I said, te may rate however te like. In addition to the common etiquette considerations above, I offer the following for consideration when te go to rate some content on Fanpop:

The one stella, star and five stella, star ratings represent extremes: the stuff te really despise, and stuff te Amore so much te want to take it home to meet your mom and dad prior to taking your relationship to the successivo level. As such, I recommend that te use either of these ratings sparingly. If everything te rate is at the extremes, it makes your ratings much less meaningful than if te were to rate only a few items at the extreme. Worse still, if many users rate at the extremes (not just you), there can be a situation where most content is either absurdly highly rated o absurdly lowly rated. In such situations, the primary purpose of ratings (#1, at the superiore, in alto of this article) is defeated. Ratings aren't worth spit if crap content, so-so content, and pretty fair content are all rated one star, nor are they worth much if good content, really great content, and the absolute best content ever are all rated five stars.

I encourage you, when rating, to consider ratings as part of a curve, like so:

This is a graph that represents how many of each type of rating is given. Simply stated, most content is likely to deserve three stars. Some content will be significantly better o worse than that, and those rare cases would deserve four o two stars, respectively. One stella, star and five stella, star ratings for content should be really exceptional. Rating with such an approach increases the likelihood that the really, really good content will have the higher ratings, and the really, really bad content will drop to the bottom of the ratings rankings.

How to read ratings
Each type of content that can have a rating shows te the aggregate rating, combining all the ratings of all the fanpop users who've inviato a rating for that content. This number is shown in the green circle, ranging from 1.0 (all raters think it's garbage) to 5.0 (all raters think it's the best thing they've seen). If no one has rated the content, it will appear as a grey cerchio Leggere 0.0.

But the other thing to keep in mind is the number of users who have rated the content. While a 1.0 may indicate the dross of the site and a 5.0 may mean something that te just have to see, they mean little if only one user has rated it. Ratings become più meaningful the più people have rated the content. So content rated 5.0 da 3 fans, while it may be fantastic, isn't necessarily so. It could easily be that the user has Friends who rate the content artificially high. Certainly such content is likely to be less impressive than a 4.3 rated da 120 fans, which is almost certain to be very, very good. Similarly, content rated a 1.7 da 3 fan could be low quality, but it's less certain to be bad than content rated 2.3 da 67 fans.


*******************************

Here's links to other parts of the guide for your quick reference:

* link

* 1: link

* 2: link.

* 3: link

* 4: Picks: this is the generic name both for the sondaggio domande that te see on the site and for the risposte te can pick to that question. Papa has created a link.

* 5: link

* 6: link

* 7: link

te may also want to see:

* link feature

* link