“Harry Potter is the End of an Era. Twilight is the End of an Error.” - The Anti-Anti-Slogan - Harry Potter vs Twilight - fanpop

3

“Harry Potter is the End of an Era. Twilight is the End of an Error.” - The Anti-Anti-Slogan

posted by cassie-1-2-3

“Harry Potter is the End of an Era. Twilight is the End of an Error.”

At first glance, te would think this is just another oh-so-clever Anti-Twilight slogan, reiterated da the Twilight hating masses, but in reality, are these antis only slamming themselves?

First off, what Era is Harry Potter ending? It’s own? So in other words, “Harry Potter is the end of Harry Potter”.

I’m assuming this “Error” is meant to represent Twilight, correct? So in other words, much like the above, “Twilight is the end of Twilight”.

In conclusion, “Harry Potter is the End of Harry Potter. Twilight is the End of Twilight.”
^Is that really for o against anything?

Do to the lack of sense this holds, I’m going to guess I misinterpreted the whole thing.

~~~
I’m going to try approaching this from a different angle. Hopefully, things will start to clear up.
~~~

Is this meant to demonstrate that the beginning of Harry Potter ended the precedente Era, which obviously lacked quality literature?
That sounds plausible.

Since Harry potter isn’t ending itself, I suppose it’s sicuro, cassetta di sicurezza to say that Twilight isn’t either, so I guess Twilight really did end some sort of error. That’s a good thing, right? If an Error can’t be corrected, then it should at least be ended.

I guess we should all thank Twilight for ending an Error, but a new domanda arises. What is this Error of which Twilight so nobly ended? Let’s restate the facts together.

*It’s already been concluded that Harry Potter ended the precedente Era…
*Twilight ended an Error…
*The first Harry Potter book was released on June 30, 1997…
*The precedente Era was ended on June 30, 1997…
*The first Twilight book was released on October 5, 2005…
*The Error was ended on October 5, 2005…
*The first Harry Potter book was released before the first Twilight book…
*The Era was ended before the Error was ended…
*Harry Potter ended an Era, but later, Twilight came around and ended an Error…

I hate to say it, but this slogan offers only one possibility… The End of an Era was an Error.

An Error which Twilight corrected… no.
THE Error which Twilight corrected!

nessie-eska, VampiresRevenge and 1 other like this

cassie-1-2-3 It appears to be unfinished intentionally.

TheLoneWolf ...I'm lost :/ I've actually never used this expression...so yeah

wotcher-tonks wait what. I feel like I'm in math class o.o

KateKicksAss Lol, this is great! And I disagree with the first slogan in general. Harry Potter ISN'T ending, and Twilight isn't an error.

londonsrock that made no sense. an era is "a period of time marked by distinctive character, events, etc." according to dicrtinary.com. when the first movie came out it was nov. 2001. 9/11 had just happened, the War in Afghanistan started that October. i think a lot of people were looking for a distraction to what was going on in the world and HP was it. the first book came out in June 1997, and the fourth book was already out by the time the first movie premiered so the people that loved the movie like me had material to read while waiting for the second one. for a lot of ppl harry potter was a companion in a decade of transition, change and growth. while i enjoy twilight's fluff i must admit it carries anti-feminist views. also, it puts too much emphasis in looks that makes the main character seem shallow and obtuse.

cassie-1-2-3 Okay... So Harry Potter ended the era of war with is still in process?

ClaireVoyant ^ i don't think that's what she is trying to say. i think she just disagree with the using of the word ERA..maybe..

twilightlover73 What people mean by this statement is (not that I use it): Harry Potter has come to an end, it changed a lot of people's lives, people grew up through it, people had their whole childhood based on Harry Potter. When it ended, it was an end of an [b]ERA[/b] the era which was not Harry Potter, but the era which Harry Potter [b]CAUSED[/b]. People who use it obviously don't like twilight and think that it's crap, they think that it's an [b]ERROR[/b] for it to start in the first place. So when it ends, it is the end of an error, the end of a mistake, not of twilight, but what twilight [b]CAUSED[/b]. So yeah, you were wrong there. When they say that they don't mean "Harry Potter is the end of Harry Potter" or "Twilight is the end of Twilight" Anyways, I don't like this statement, and even though I don't like twilight anymore, I used to. So that's another reason for a person like me to show respect to the series, which is why I don't really like such phrases and disapprove of this one.

cassie-1-2-3 I've always understood what it meant.

twilightlover73 ^Really? [i]First off, what Era is Harry Potter ending? It’s own? So in other words, “Harry Potter is the end of Harry Potter”. I’m assuming this “Error” is meant to represent Twilight, correct? So in other words, much like the above, “Twilight is the end of Twilight”. In conclusion, “Harry Potter is the End of Harry Potter. Twilight is the End of Twilight.”[/i] I don't think so

cassie-1-2-3 This article was meant to be a bit of satire. I know exactly what the phrase means. I do feel that it can be easily misunderstood, since it's not worded very well. It can be interpreted this way, but I always knew how it was INTENDED to be interpreted, hence the first sentence.

Catalunya Like it :p

slytherin713 Wait...what!?!?!? I don't get it LOL. I guess it's math class. Time for math class singing! Nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan nyan- Nyan cat LOL

2

HP Facebook convos

added by lilcherrywine

6

Ravenclaw

added by Gred_and_Forge

Source: Tumblr

Diagonally

added by Gred_and_Forge

Source: Tumblr

3

Funny Memebase pics :D

added by GemonkDruid

Source: Memebase

1

domande regarding Breaking Dawn

posted by bri-marie

Note: I originally had this as a question, but I guess it was too long, so I'm re-posting this in an article.

Question number one: Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. hearts don't beat, correct? Correct. I believe this is mentioned several times. Now, in health class, they teach te that your cuore pumps and makes your blood flow, correct? Correct. So, it stands to reason that, since Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between. hearts don't beat, they don't have blood flow, correct? Yes. So, they have no blood flow, no circulation. They cannot bleed, o blush, o anything related to circulation, yes? Yes. This is detto several times in the book.

Now, call...

1

Hermione Granger ~ Dancing w/ Tears in my Eyes

added by karlyluvsam

@dudetotally10word

video

twilight

Harry Potter

Flaws

added by RonGetYourWand

Flaws

added by RonGetYourWand

Source: ReasoningWithVampires

Flaws

added by RonGetYourWand

Source: ReasoningWithVampires

Flaws

added by RonGetYourWand

Source: ReasoningWithVampires

Flaws

added by RonGetYourWand

Source: ReasoningWithVampires

Flaws

added by RonGetYourWand

Source: ReasoningWith Vampiri#From Dracula to Buffy... and all creatures of the night in between.

1/16/12 concerto Leggere of Twilight: The Musical!

added by goodtimes

Source: BroadwayWorld.com, Playbill.com, & Erin McAndrew

Breaking Dawn and Deathly Hallows

added by bddh

Source: tumblr

1

da the Grace of God stop saying "Characters are hot /in the movies, therefore book is excellent".

posted by Aquilia

I have just tried to refute another "Edward is hot" type fallacy. I've had enough, I'm ready to puke - pardon the language - in link if I see another one. In the foreseeable future, I shall either not bother with such fallacies but instead ignore and ridicule o point to this article. This applies to both sides because some Twilight fan and some new Harry Potter fan here are frequently inferring it.

I point to my precedente article: link for the introduction.
I shall here only point out Number Six:
Non sequitur.
What is a Non Sequitur and a fallacy: I shall again refer to oxford English Dictionary...

Gatti VS Cani

posted by smilealways

I think Cani are way better than Gatti because they actually Amore te più than Gatti do. The only reason why Gatti Amore te is that te feed them and that is it. Cani are such emotional animali that if te are having a bad giorno they will come over and snuggle up in your lap and with Gatti te have to get up and walk over to them! Also te might say but some Cani are aggressive and bark all the time that’s only because they have been treated badly, a science study actually proved that no dog is born bad it is the owner the only reason if a dog is born bad is if it has a mental health issue but...

10

96 Reasons Why Harry Potter Sucks

posted by omg_stop

1.Ginny is a perfect character (“Mary Sue”), which Rowling hides da calling her temperamental.
2. Being temperamental is not a flaw if everyone thinks it’s cute and adorable and it gets te a boyfriend.
3. NOBODY can do anything productive without magic.
4. Ginny runs after a train like an idiot even though this isn’t her first time watching the train leave with her brothers. Obviously she’s watch the train leave EVERY SINGLE anno OF HER LIFE.
5. Rowling is living out her own fantasies through Hermione, who is clearly herself.
6. The libri aren’t well written, just because te make up...

7

why Ron/Hermione pwn Bella/Edward

added by angelwarren

South Park-ed characters

added by youknowit101

Source: tumblr

10

Emma and Kristen

added by BellaLovett