Okay, firstly, I’ve no intention of hurting the Twilight fan here. I’m just a fiercely opinionated person, and some of the things I say might end up sounding rude. So please keep in mind that I really don’t mean anything rude that I might say in the article. Read on :)
Many people say that Twilight is well written. When I ask the detto people why they think so, most of them invariably refer to the “big words” in Twilight.
Now, if using big words makes a book good, an ape with a thesaurus can write a completely fabulous novel. Sadly, this isn’t the case: the poor apes are doomed for eternity if they think they can write a good piece of literature. Let’s leave out the monkey details and get to the book.
When te look closely into Twilight, this is what te observe:
Big words: many
Adjectives: way too many
Similes: Few; repeated very often.
Metaphors: None
Details: Bella’s many admirers, Edward, the Cullens and Bella’s truck are described meticulously. And as for the rest of it... Hold on; was there anything else in the book?
Let me deal with the big words and adjectives. They are extremely catchy and make a book seem “intelligent”. Now, let’s look at these two sentences:
1. I wondered if the exhausted girl would collapse any moment.
2. The girl was slouched and could barely keep her eyes open. I was almost sure that she’d drop down any moment.
Doesn’t the secondo sentence sound più expressive? Why is that, do te think?
Adjectives and big words may sound smarter, but descriptions and metaphors bring life to a sentence. Mark Twain said, “When te catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable.”
Golden Rule no.1: Ditch the adjective/adverb. Bring in some più words.
The similes in Twilight are annoyingly repetitive (bronze-hair, marble-skin, topaz-eyes) and the metaphors are non-existent.
Golden Rule no.2: Use a variety of similes and metaphors to make your story interesting.
Also, when te look at the two sentences, te find that the one with più adjectives explains while the other one describes. descrizione is always better than explanation, at least in fiction novels. This is because descrizione is più personal. Explanation, on the other hand, makes te feel like the writer is trying to outsmart you.
Golden Rule no.3: Quit trying to sound smarter than your readers.
Moving on, te needn’t, rather mustn’t write exactly what the reader wants te to. But that doesn’t mean that te are free to disappoint your reader. Why was there so much build-up in Breaking Dawn for a freaking fight that didn’t even happen?
I positively hated the abysmal ending of Breaking Dawn.
Some things happened in Harry Potter that I didn’t particularly like, as well (Fred/Dobby/Anybody’s death). But that didn’t make me hate the book at all; in fact, it made me Amore it more. Even though I hated those parts, I wouldn’t ever omit them, because that’d kill the essence of the book.
Golden Rule no. 4: Your readers mustn’t control your decisions, but they are quite important. Give them something they can appreciate.
Next, I’d like to discuss unnecessary details. Both HP and Twilight contain them. But, What’s the difference?
Harry Potter:
Green Eyes: First insignificant, later significant
Locket in Grimmauld Place: First highly insignificant, later extremely important.
Snape’s nature: We all thought it just added spice to the books. Boy, were we wrong.
Harry almost swallowed his first snitch: Similar scenario.
Riddle’s diary: I’m getting tired of typing the same things.
Twilight:
Edward’s hair: Insignificant
Edward’s Eyes: Insignificant
Edward’s Jaw line: EXTREMELY insignificant
Should I go on, o do get what I’m saying?
Golden Rule no. 5: When te write, make sure te write meaningful things. Commercial nonsense annoys the crap out of me.
Well, those are the reasons why I dislike Meyer's writing. Her style of Scrivere doesn't follow even one of my so-called Golden Rules.
Rant over.
Please feel free to disagree; I’d Amore some healthy (keyword: healthy) arguments! :)
Many people say that Twilight is well written. When I ask the detto people why they think so, most of them invariably refer to the “big words” in Twilight.
Now, if using big words makes a book good, an ape with a thesaurus can write a completely fabulous novel. Sadly, this isn’t the case: the poor apes are doomed for eternity if they think they can write a good piece of literature. Let’s leave out the monkey details and get to the book.
When te look closely into Twilight, this is what te observe:
Big words: many
Adjectives: way too many
Similes: Few; repeated very often.
Metaphors: None
Details: Bella’s many admirers, Edward, the Cullens and Bella’s truck are described meticulously. And as for the rest of it... Hold on; was there anything else in the book?
Let me deal with the big words and adjectives. They are extremely catchy and make a book seem “intelligent”. Now, let’s look at these two sentences:
1. I wondered if the exhausted girl would collapse any moment.
2. The girl was slouched and could barely keep her eyes open. I was almost sure that she’d drop down any moment.
Doesn’t the secondo sentence sound più expressive? Why is that, do te think?
Adjectives and big words may sound smarter, but descriptions and metaphors bring life to a sentence. Mark Twain said, “When te catch an adjective, kill it. No, I don't mean utterly, but kill most of them--then the rest will be valuable.”
Golden Rule no.1: Ditch the adjective/adverb. Bring in some più words.
The similes in Twilight are annoyingly repetitive (bronze-hair, marble-skin, topaz-eyes) and the metaphors are non-existent.
Golden Rule no.2: Use a variety of similes and metaphors to make your story interesting.
Also, when te look at the two sentences, te find that the one with più adjectives explains while the other one describes. descrizione is always better than explanation, at least in fiction novels. This is because descrizione is più personal. Explanation, on the other hand, makes te feel like the writer is trying to outsmart you.
Golden Rule no.3: Quit trying to sound smarter than your readers.
Moving on, te needn’t, rather mustn’t write exactly what the reader wants te to. But that doesn’t mean that te are free to disappoint your reader. Why was there so much build-up in Breaking Dawn for a freaking fight that didn’t even happen?
I positively hated the abysmal ending of Breaking Dawn.
Some things happened in Harry Potter that I didn’t particularly like, as well (Fred/Dobby/Anybody’s death). But that didn’t make me hate the book at all; in fact, it made me Amore it more. Even though I hated those parts, I wouldn’t ever omit them, because that’d kill the essence of the book.
Golden Rule no. 4: Your readers mustn’t control your decisions, but they are quite important. Give them something they can appreciate.
Next, I’d like to discuss unnecessary details. Both HP and Twilight contain them. But, What’s the difference?
Harry Potter:
Green Eyes: First insignificant, later significant
Locket in Grimmauld Place: First highly insignificant, later extremely important.
Snape’s nature: We all thought it just added spice to the books. Boy, were we wrong.
Harry almost swallowed his first snitch: Similar scenario.
Riddle’s diary: I’m getting tired of typing the same things.
Twilight:
Edward’s hair: Insignificant
Edward’s Eyes: Insignificant
Edward’s Jaw line: EXTREMELY insignificant
Should I go on, o do get what I’m saying?
Golden Rule no. 5: When te write, make sure te write meaningful things. Commercial nonsense annoys the crap out of me.
Well, those are the reasons why I dislike Meyer's writing. Her style of Scrivere doesn't follow even one of my so-called Golden Rules.
Rant over.
Please feel free to disagree; I’d Amore some healthy (keyword: healthy) arguments! :)
