*sigh*
Although I hate to admit it, it ought to be put into two different movies, much like the way Peter Jackson put content from the Two Towers into The Return Of The King.
It would mean that we'd get a much better movie than that last one which was like watching a car crash. (I had to look away.) The scenes look great, but we never get to see the events o hear the lines before being wisked away to see another set and be deaf to another set of lines we ought to hear.
I really don't want that to happen again, because lets face it, it sucks. Thus, two Film would be better. The first three Film (which are short books, o at least shorter than the rest of the series) were great. Then when the director started on the fourth (which is a large book) things started to slip through. Things were left forgotten which should have never been forgotten. (Notably the fact that Dumbledore would have NEVER thought Harry had really put his name in the cup.)
Conclusion: If the book (content) the director is dealing with is shorter, the Film are better.
So, I think that if they divide Deathly Hallows (I don't how where o how) it would make a better movie. Although it would mean waiting another year, it might just mean a better movie.
-Lunatic
Although I hate to admit it, it ought to be put into two different movies, much like the way Peter Jackson put content from the Two Towers into The Return Of The King.
It would mean that we'd get a much better movie than that last one which was like watching a car crash. (I had to look away.) The scenes look great, but we never get to see the events o hear the lines before being wisked away to see another set and be deaf to another set of lines we ought to hear.
I really don't want that to happen again, because lets face it, it sucks. Thus, two Film would be better. The first three Film (which are short books, o at least shorter than the rest of the series) were great. Then when the director started on the fourth (which is a large book) things started to slip through. Things were left forgotten which should have never been forgotten. (Notably the fact that Dumbledore would have NEVER thought Harry had really put his name in the cup.)
Conclusion: If the book (content) the director is dealing with is shorter, the Film are better.
So, I think that if they divide Deathly Hallows (I don't how where o how) it would make a better movie. Although it would mean waiting another year, it might just mean a better movie.
-Lunatic
The Ministry of Magic.
It Should Not Be A Film
Since the passing of Alan Rickman, it would be difficult to portray him as Professor Snape as a sign of respect to the actor who has passed on yesteryear despite he is only feature in one scene during the play.
It Should Be A Film
Unless if they get the original choice, Tim Roth to play Professor Snape in one scene, I'm sure that the film will be magical like the play.
They would use special make-up on the original cast of Hermione, Harry, Ron, Ginny and Draco as adults. I would be looking inoltrare, avanti to see the original casts be part of the film again!
The Wizarding World Revisited
So, do te want the play to be translated into a film like the precedente Harry Potter adaptations? Please commento and tell me on what do te think?
The Cast.
