Harry Potter Article: Harry Potter voted best book to film adaptation of all time (fb.com/DanielJacobRadcliffeFanClub)

2

Harry Potter voted best book to film adaptation of all time (fb.com/DanielJacobRadcliffeFanClub)

posted by irfanraza

Daniel Radcliffe, Rupert Grint and Emma Watson’s portrayal of J. K. Rowling’s wizarding trio Harry, Ron and Hermione has impressed film buffs who have voted it the best book to film adaptation of all time.

The sondaggio – run da Samsung Electronics – was set up to coincide with the release of David Fincher’s screen adaptation of Gone Girl starring Rosamund luccio and Ben Affleck.

A third of film buffs voted the Harry Potter series - starring Alan Rickman, Maggie Smith and Warwick Davis - as the best adaptation.

Award winning The Shawshank Redemption starring morgan Freeman and Tim Robbins followed closely in second, with The Lord of the Rings trilogy taking third place.

Other favourites to make the lista were romantic classic Gone With the Wind starring Vivien Leigh and Clarke Gable as Scarlett O’Hara and Rhett Butler, as well as Silence of the Lambs and Bridget Jones’s Diary.

Robert Pattinson may have earned himself an army of adoring female fan in vampire fantasy, Twilight but the film adaptation failed to match up to the novel’s success.

Starring Kristen Stewart and Taylor Lautner, the film – based on the book da Stephenie Meyer – was voted as one of the worst adaptations.

The Da Vinci Code starring Tom Hanks and Paul Bettany, and Japanese tale Memoirs of a Geisha also failed to impress on the big screen.

For aggiornamenti About Daniel Radcliffe & Harry Potter

Like : Facebook.com/DanielJacobRadcliffeFanClub
Follow: Twitter.com/DanielFClub
Follow On Google Plus: plus.google.com/+DanielRadcliffeFC

karolinak1999 and linhousepotter like this

Flickerflame Is this for the entire series of a specific film? Because they left loads out!

bendaimmortal I think those so-called "film buffs" must be very ignorant about existing book-to-film adapted movies. I mean, no one would otherwise vote any of the HP movies as best such adaptations of [b]all time[/b]. There are numerous much better adapted out there. That is, those that don't leave tons of essential stuff out and replace them with pointless made-up scenes but still manage to be dynamic and correctly atmospheric movies. In my opinion the only thing the HP movie series has going for it are good actors and the HP universe atmosphare. The storyline's adaptation kind of sucks and some characters ended up butchered unnecessarely. To mention a couple of much better book-to-films: - Peter Jackson's The Lord of the Rings trilogy. (Especially The Fellowship of the Ring and The Return of The King.) - Finger.smith. (Even if it's technically released as a TV mini series, it's total runtime is that of a long movie.) I've seen tens of films adapted from books but most I haven't been interested enough to read the book or haven't yet read them. So I can't form an opinion on them as adaptations. But I'm sure many of them must be better made than the Potter films. Not only because the Potter films simply are poorlty made in the mentioned areas, but because many of the others are hugely praised by people without the original book being as enormous world-wide megahit as the HP books are. Okay, to be fair, the Philosopher's Stone & the Chamber of Secrets actually are quite well adapted. And perhaps Deathly Hallows Part 1 is passable. But otherwise, they didn't seem to care enough.