Harry Potter Club
unisciti
Fanpop
New Post
Explore Fanpop
added by
video
Harry Potter
fan video
added by Misstmor
added by tubby2002
After having a long discussion with my friend, I came across a pattern in the series. Is history repeating itself? and are the harry potter libri truly over?The normal font= the first war, and the italics= the secondo war. Read through the normal font first. Go back and read the italic font only. Then read them together. My theory will make sense (i hope)

First, Lord voldemort rises into power and harry's parents and others form The Order of the Phoenix
In the fourth book, voldemort rises into power and harry and others form Dumbledore's Army

Voldemort killes mudbloods and halfbreeds in the first...
continue reading...
posted by snoznoodle
I had a thought...

I'm sure I'm not the only one who is wondering how on earth Harry, Ron and Hermione could destroy all those horcruxes when Dumbledore, one of the greatest wizards ever almost died trying to destroy two of them.

And since Dumbledore and Harry really aren't the only ones who know about Voldemort's horcruxes, its possible that RAB has actually done the work for them without Voldemort realising it. Its possible that he actually destroyed all the horcruxes besides Nagini but somehow didn't live to tell anyone.

So the only horcrux that they would have to destroy would be the snake. Remember Voldemort only made Nagini a horcrux in Goblet of Fire. So she is at least one horcrux left that we know still exists.

I can't see Harry, Ron and Hermione managing to destroy 4 horcruxes without one of them dying o getting seriously injured. That could happen too however...

CAN'T WAIT TILL IT COMES OUT! 5 DAYS TO GO!
Throughout the Harry Potter books, there are some variations between the Bloomsbury (British) and Scholastic (American) editions. Below the first section on "Philosopher's vs. Sorcerer's" is a section on other different terminologies used.

Philosopher's vs. Sorcerer's

When Scholastic was publishing Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone in America, they decided to rename the book Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone. They claimed that the American and British uses of the word philosopher were a bit different, so therefore sorcerer was a più appropriate word. Any true Harry Potter fan, American...
continue reading...
added by Priscilita22
Source: http://www.artdungeon.net/hbp/dragontattoo.html
added by Misstmor
added by Misstmor
added by PotterGal
added by kathiria82
posted by Sydney
te always hear people saying there are discrepencies in the Harry Potter books, but I have truly found a plot hole.

It is a major plot hole, I have noticed, in the Harry Potter series...A very serious one.

Everyone's always talking about how much Harry looks like his father, even Hagrid in the first book.

Molly and Arthur were in the order with Harry's parents ie James.

Why didn't Molly recognise Harry at Kings attraversare, croce station?

He has the same black, sticking-up hair. And the scar!

And just look at the moment Fred and George told Molly that he was Harry Potter.

~ Sydney.
Ever since J.K Rowling revealed that Dumbledore was gay on October 19th i've had to domanda the fact about why this piece of information became
front page news.
Firstly to put my own opinion out, i personally think that this was a very Ribelle - The Brave thing of JKR to say and whilst i support this statement of hers, it doesn't change my perception of the books. Dumbledore is still the wise, old Headmaster who can make mistakes just like any of us, whom i learned to Amore over the course of the books.
However, there are many fan who now think that they can "never read the libri in the same way again"....
continue reading...
added by firesnorter
added by dlyteful
Source: zutto.mine.nu
added by tubby2002
added by Misstmor
added by tubby2002
posted by Lunatic
*sigh*

Although I hate to admit it, it ought to be put into two different movies, much like the way Peter Jackson put content from the Two Towers into The Return Of The King.

It would mean that we'd get a much better movie than that last one which was like watching a car crash. (I had to look away.) The scenes look great, but we never get to see the events o hear the lines before being wisked away to see another set and be deaf to another set of lines we ought to hear.

I really don't want that to happen again, because lets face it, it sucks. Thus, two Film would be better. The first three...
continue reading...
added by PotterGal
added by kathiria82