What is it..?

There are a few occasions...

Basically people have kinks. Kinkshaming is judging a person for them.

I tend to do it inwardly and keep it to myself unless the person keeps going on and on about and flaunting their kinks.

Generally nope. But there's occasionally where the kink was so against my viewpoints that I couldn't help but kinkshame and other times I only kinkshame when people go on and on about it. Sooo. Generally I do not

For the most part I dont mind as long as they dont go on and on about it. There are a few exceptions like pedophilic kinks and those ones that really are sick and can cause harm to another person / being.

Like I will hard core kinkshame pedophilia and stuff like crush porn

^ Those are the few occasions !!!!

"Like I will hard core kinkshame pedophilia and stuff like crush porn" Same. Crush porn is just vile and pedophilia is sick. 'MAPs' can piss off. You're not a 'minor attracted person', you're a pedo. Plain and simple.

Yup pretty much like riku honestly. Causing unwanted harm to people isn't cool so the kinks that cause unwanted harm or the ones that are simply against my viewpoints I will kinkshame.

Nah, not really.
Only time I will judge is if it's fking weird. Like really fking weird. Illegal or something like that too. But I mean, anyone in their right mind would be against such things.
But generally I leave people to like what they want.

^ same. But I feel like my definition of weird link is a lot looser than most people's. Which probably has to do with the whole ace thing. None the less, if the person isn't hurting anyone (while I will make silent judgments) I won't say anything. You do you...or in this case the other person lmao.

I dunno I'm into taco sauce and that's kinda weird

I'll have my husband lick that shit off my tits all day long

More accurately, I have zero tolerance whatsoever for people who pubicly fetish-ise Lolita fashion.

Sometimes, fetishists/ageplayers will wear Lolita fashion and tag it as a fetish. Other times, people will add sexual captions to pictures of random Lolitas without their permission. Sometimes ageplayers will tag their non-Lolita ageplay outfits as Lolita fashion. Things like that.
Lolita specifically is a non-sexual fashion, but despite that people often think it's sexual nature, partly because it's strange but also partly because of the name which everyone in the community is frustrated with.

I don't care if ageplayers/fetishists want to wear it sexually on their own time- it's not my business what gets them wet- but it irks me to no end when they conflate the two publicly. It directly affects how people that aren't in the fashion see us, and it's resulted in people getting sexually harassed or antagonized because people see their fashion choices as a fetish when it very, very, very much isn't one.

Other than that specific situation I dont care at all what people's kinks are or what they do in the bedroom so long as it's between two consenting adults. I don't even care about ageplayers (despite particularly bringing them up) outside of the topic of conflating their kink with my fashion.

I can see how that would be aggravating. It'd be pretty annoying to have your hobby/aesthetic constantly sexualized.

NEVER

It really depends on what it`s about. If it`s harmless, then I`m totally ok with it, but if it`s something gross or even illegal, of course I won`t be ok with it.

^ Same. But more so for illegal.