DancingHumphrey And he can't understand that there is NO misunderstanding about me in many cases about him. He always think he's always right, but all I can see is a huge BIGOT. Look sorry for this rant but Mojo really did cause so much trouble here, as the evidence is provided. Mojo, you need to apologize for your actions because what you did was wrong, cruel, and very effected. Sorry but if you won't say sorry, then I won't say sorry.

DancingHumphrey " and all because I supposedly hurt your feelings and won't apologize." Dude, you have no idea what you did still. You made people turn against me, and that wasn't simply just a feeling thing, and even if it was, that stuff causes anxiety. Your sound like a anti-gay monster and say "Haha I hurt your feelings, that's not painful". It is painful man. The way you act thinking that what you did "wasn't" cruel when it WAS is messed up. Yet, I "hurt your feelings" too, and you freak out. You freak out about me trying to get members to turn against you (Though it wasn't even trying to ban you it's self), but you DID THE SAME THING to me. Why can't you understand that? If you were to say sorry, and understand what you did was wrong. Then I would do it back.

DancingHumphrey "People were reporting your account left and right before I made that petition. I didn't make them do that." No dude, you still caused people to do that and take action. In fact, seeing people turn against me like that, and showing it promotes harassment, promotes more ideas, etc, etc.. If you didn't have that article, then I wouldn't see members do that, and you know what? You made people SIGN IT, you made people do more action because of that, and made more people turn against me. Your were encouraging it and making people think crap about me, even more. You were resposible for this, even if some people already flagged me. You made things a lot worse with that article, and you shouldn't of done that. Yet when I do it back, you freak out and tell me that I'm causing problems when you did it first. And no mojo, you can make people cause more action than what they did. Yes sorry I'm replying like I didn't read it all, but you know what? Your comments are just too hypocritical to read fully, and you keep blaming that you had "nothing" to do with this! You do. You should know that what you do, can cause people to do more stuff, and crap. You made more people sign it, you made people do horrible action, and it's a "petition", that's about action, and thanks to your article, you made people sign there names.. And cause more further action. Free will or not, seeing people sign petitions like that is is yet, further action. And you mojo, is highly responsible for that. And mojo, your the one who has flaws and problems in your brain. I even pointed out what you violated and all you do is kind of sexually harass me with stupid wife names. That's it. If you were open minded, you would actually read what you've been doing. Calling me delusional or Journeyer when I'm actually trying to compare and stuff, is very offensive, and all you do is get away with people listening to your horrible anti-social crap. Sorry mojo, but what you've done to me encouraged people do to more bad stuff. You made members do that, and you know what? Why did you make it then? Because you wanted people to do action to me.. Like you said: "Members already flagged me right"? See? You were making people do more action about me.. So it is your fault.

DancingHumphrey Dude, you made people do more action, your article clearly stated as a "petition". The article's purpose is to encourage members to do more action and it encouraged people from the outside to do the same, including OmegaKing's friends. It caused harassment, it caused things that didn't need to happen, etc, etc. And you know what? I'm not even trying to get people to be your enemy, I'm stating that they shouldn't listen to you when you claim I'm "delusional" (You do that, I do it back). I'm stating that your wrong. That's it. You can still be friends all you want with them. But what you did, was promoted rude things against me. And yes, you are responsible. What would of happened if you didn't make that article? ۩ There would be less people reporting me ۩They wouldn't post rude offensive comments like "Let's get rid of area" ۩Many of your influencing ideas would of not effected them ۩Many people wouldn't be against me ۩If the current members before your article was made already flagged me, it would of been more different. See, your article is a petition. That is literally ASKING people to do action again me. And your the OP MojoOmegaWolf. You made people SIGN.. And it's very questionable for you to make it anyway if like you say: "Members already flagged me" So therefor again, you made it for the purpose of action too. And you are very responsible. Your article is the worst "disrespect" of members I've ever seen. Sure I made ones about you (I think it was one? Correct me if wrong), but what you did, was the worst thing ever. Causing people to sign your action activist article was the worst thing you've done. And you should look at the last comment by Journeyer.

Journeyer Hey, I saw your update, I sent OmegaKing a private message about this. I do think he shouldn't of said that you can't stand up back. He also 'doesn't have the right' to say you can't disagree on the offensive term.. I wanted to talk about this, and yes, Gay people DO have a right to feel offended and you probably should not tell them that. However, you also have a right to feel offended too, and that you are allowed to disagree with a claim involving a work not theirs. Were you saying that they can't feel offended, or was it more about the claim involving stuff not theirs other than (e.g.) sanman7's article? In fact, the idea that you must be Gay to define over others not only sounds like sexism, but even if you were Gay, you still can't decide that over other gay people not you. Because just because you are gay (for example), that doesn't make you have the right to stand up about 'offensive' or 'offense' over other gay people not you. No matter what your sexual identity is. But you are allowed to argue what counts as "attacking" or "offensive" if it involves claims over works not even intending to be offensive. What is "offensive"? Oh yeah, I forgot, apparently according to the book, offensive can be anything. Even this monkey face I put here can be offensive.. I think there should be a definition of it.. If something isn't intending to sterotype, or be rude, or other depends, then it shouldn't be offensive.

Journeyer Your also right too, I don't think Homosexuals should decide what is "offensive" as a global fact over stuff that's also your interest. Example: Your a furry bisexual right? As you said? Say you made a furry 'gay' sided expression? You have a right to enjoy that, and you are allowed to because a bisexual is allowed to enjoy stuff like this too. The only difference is that you have an extra alternative (Heterosexuality) as well. So I will agree with you that they should not define what is "offensive" over you. They can feel offended if they like, but they should not be putting that over your own identity or your own works that aren't theirs. I mean, it's not theirs. Even if the work was made by the same exact orientation. But if they are allowed to argue (They probably are apparently), you are also allowed to argue back and I do have to agree with you, that people shouldn't tell you that you can't argue back just because your orientation is more different than them, "fetish or not".

DancingHumphrey @MojoOmegaWolf Did you even read what I said? You made the petitation for a purpose. You encourage those to do more action that they already did (over some members). You made more poeple sign, and you encourage action. If they already "reported me" then why the hell did you make it then? Stop acting like you have "no" effect. What you did was awful, offensive, etc.. Let me show you: But what you did, was promoted rude things against me. And yes, you are responsible. What would of happened if you didn't make that article? ۩ There would be less people reporting me ۩They wouldn't post rude offensive comments like "Let's get rid of area" ۩Many of your influencing ideas would of not effected them ۩Many people wouldn't be against me ۩If the current members before your article was made already flagged me, it would of been more different. __________ " It started off with your anthropomorphism debate you had last year that caused LillyOmega to leave, then you caused people to grow tired of this place with your whole "Nobody knows that this club will die" spiel a few months ago, which by the way started after people started leaving because of your constant fighting, " BULLSHIT. You don't know for sure if I made people leave. Also, LO did fight too. And WHAT? So let me get this straight, you get to make an article claiming it will die, but if I make one back, I'm somehow trouble? Your trouble, and you have no clue if that made people leave. Stop leaving claims that has no evidence at all. Besides, I heard comments like yours made people leave. Sorry dude, but it's not my fault to why I stand up. Your are excredbly bias. And it's not my fault they leave. Like you "said". They have the CHOICE to stay and honestly. I find it extremely offense for you to say that I can't stand up about stuff like anthropomorphism, and your bias "It will die" crap. People are allowed to use there freedom of speech and argue back.. Besides, your the one that argued first, same with other people involving anthropomorphism. You need to stop pointing fingers at me. I did NOTHING wrong with standing up about anthropomorphism nor wanting to make that article about nobody knows. Seriously, how the hell is that a problem? You get to make a delusional claim involving the future that you don't know, but when I give out FAITH for people, that makes people LEAVE? You are extremely bias and hypocritical about me, and honestly, you are a bigot.

DancingHumphrey By the way Mojo, your the one that talks crap about me in the now, and you left that. Maybe that's why I talk about it. Face it, your responsible for people leaving. Maybe I effected stuff to in some cases like this year, who knows.. But again, that Nobody knows article DID NOT make people leave, I mean where is your proof? How DARE YOU act like that to me for wanting to state my opinion about faith and people keeping stuff alive. You make a bad claim pretending you know the future, and all I wanted to do was give people faith and tell people that nobody knows for sure.

DancingHumphrey Also Mojo: If people have "free will" to ignore your petition, then people have 'free will' to ignore my talks about you.. But you freak out whenever I do exactly what you do. @Journeyer THANK YOU SO MUCH!! And yes, I think that's true. Gay people DO have a right to feel offended, or any other feeling, but that includes other people too. Saying I can't feel offended or disagree (If they make a claim over others and people's works that aren't theirs) just because my identity is more different than them (Yet, it still has gay with this stuff) is rude. And it's sexism.

SanaliWolfofLuv Mojo thats enough! Its easy to fight and not too but it must be impossible for u and sorry area and you too. all y'all to are doing is feeding each other reason to keep on. so both just shout the hell up and this can be done. No one said We where getting bullied in to submission. I chose to stop because im tried of the fighting and i am sure i speak for everyone when i say that we where not bullied in to submission

DancingHumphrey @Mojo Your claim that it will "die" is NOT reality and nobody wants to hear that. Faith is like the idea of possibilities, and nobody wants to listen to your "faith" crap either then.* In fact, there are people very open about hope and futures involving this. And you claiming that "It will die" when that's just a low guess, is stupid. My idea was based off real world observations, like yours, but you had only one side.. It's true, NOBODY KNOWS, and you claiming as if you do know is like claiming "No God" but without evidence. An Atheist for example is about the LACK of belief, but if one were to say "No such thing as God", then that's not any different than saying "There is a God".. Though mine (The nobody knows fandom part) was based off reality saying that we can't tell. You claiming that your view is "reality" is flawed. Because you are basing that off a guess that you don't know. It's unscientific perhaps too. But it is true that you don't know the future, and you make a random guess you can't tell. All I did was show that things can change that, which is based off a real observation of real-world evidence.. Unlike yours. Honestly Mojo, nobody wanted to hear your "It will die" crap. That was bias, and less reality. My idea was based off real observation, based off the fact that nobody actually knows. Your claim was closed minded, mine was based off real nobody knows stuff.. "You talk a lot of suicide." Of course, only like 2 fucking times. I did say trolling can be connected, and that's been proven by studies. And I said I wish I was brave sometimes. That's it. I'm not going to bother reading the rest of your filfth Mojo. You are bias, and your article you made claiming "It will die" has upseted members. Deal with it. All I did was address the fact that nobody knows, things can come back, etc, etc.. And yes, they can.. Your claim that "it will die" and claiming that as a "reality" is extremely bigoted, as it lacks a shit ton of credibility. And you are bullies Mojo.. Though it's pretty much YOU.. You did a lot of bad stuff to me, and yes, that is bullies.. You insulted the way I grow up out of your BELIEFS, etc, etc. ____________ "And neither should anybody else in this club. " Oh shut up. Nobody wants to bow down to your BULLSHIT about your ideas of the fandom, your claim about me, etc, etc.. Nobody wants to listen to your garbage trash talk about me. What you claim is arguable and you did a lot of hypocritical crap without any form of care for others. And I already proved that what you did was effected with that petition, and you can't seem to get that. Why did you make it you bully? Why? FACE IT. And honestly Mojo, I never said I was perfect (Unlike you).

SanaliWolfofLuv Oh Area im a Atheist So watch it -_-

DancingHumphrey @Sanal He needs to say it first. He keeps insulting my life, claiming I start it further when all I wanted to do was give open evidence faith of something many people would want.. When I disagree and argue with an open mind, Mojo now said "I started it, I effected people, etc, etc". That was just offensive of him, and it shows that he can't respect people who disagrees with him. He claims I "effect people" to leave.. But he has no idea that he's obviously possibly does the same with his articles. Including the "It will die" claim.. Which upset me, and a few others. And mine was meant to make people more happy and faithful for something they want.

DancingHumphrey @Sanal, I'm not saying it's wrong to be one. I'm saying an Atheist is about the lack of belief (That's what it means right?). Claiming there is no God as an argument is no different than saying there is a God as an argument.. But lack of belief is in the middle from what I heard. Not trying to be offensive or anything. Just stating what I heard I think.

SanaliWolfofLuv aIk But there comes a time to just forgive and forget. and this goes for u too mojo.

SanaliWolfofLuv Oh ok just becareful next time when u say something like that

DancingHumphrey I could, but he won't take back what he said, about my life, claiming I made people leave with my article, claiming nobody wants to hear "faith" (Nobody wants to hear "it will die"), promotes harassment with effecting articles like Petitions, etc, etc. He has a lot of delusional dry term beliefs that makes him be proud.. And he has no idea that he effected people to leave (just like me) during the fight.. Hell, that article I made months ago wasn't even a fight. lol If he could admit that he was wrong on so many things, including sanman7 (Yes comments like those on something not intended is offensive), or at least not do that next time, etc, etc.. Then I would forgive back and consider Mojo a good guy once again. I just don't want this guy to get away with horrible things he's done to others and act like he's "friendly" when he's not. Sorry but he just isn't open minded about anything these days. I'm not even trying to insult, but it's true. (As he claims over me with bad arguable things). And of course, I'm not perfect either.

SanaliWolfofLuv He Wont get away with it. Ever heard of what comes around goes around? What ever he has done wrong will back fire on him

SanaliWolfofLuv And Again Mojo Enough is enough! >:( Im tired of the fighting! so for all that is holy say your sorry damn!

SanaliWolfofLuv Omg! Just Stop responding to him then!

DancingHumphrey @Mojo "I never said that they had to. I just want people to do what they want without being told how they should think act or speak" Bullshit, you do that to me, and honestly Mojo, when someone argues, of course it means that.. But you do it, other members do it, etc, etc. WE ARE ALL THE SAME. Seriously poeple have the right to argue and even "tell people". Being offensive on people's own article is just wrong. And people ARE allowed to argue someone. Of COURSE it's telling people how to think, but you do that to me, everyone does it.. So stop making that up only to me as if that's bad.. People argue all the damn time. And honestly if people are going to post shit like "Gross", etc, etc. Then people are allowed to argue and tell them to 'stop' because that stuff is rude. Again, you tell people how to think, and your doing it now. Also, I don't see how my stuff is "delusionary". Saying "nobody knows" is actually the oppsite. It's the thing that doesn't take sides of: "It will live forever" or "It will die". But it is actually more open and true to say "It depends on what people do" too. And screw you Mojo, you need to say sorry because what you did was hurtful, you did fucked up actions on people, you promoted suffering, and you made members sign on purpose, you insulted my life, etc, etc. If your not going to say sorry, then I hope you do get banned and never come back. Sorry man, but you are terrible, a rude fucked up person, and you are never open minded. You think you did nothing wrong? Well you did, and I have the right to argue you that. Edit - YES mojo, your claim IS faith. My claim is more open and more truthful due to what I see. It is true that NONE of us knows and it is true that it depends on what people do. That's actually a real thing Mojo, but yours was based off a random guess without knowing others or any other observation. If yours isn't faith, then mine isn't faith.

DancingHumphrey "but you constantly seek to destroy the things you defend tooth and nail just because you no longer see them fitting for your presence." Oh your the one who does that shit. I don't do that, What I'm doing is ARGUING to what I believe is "right" or "wrong" and other stuff or something. EVERYONE DOES IT. And I'm not saying home school means more smart, though it's suggested that it is because your not a slave much. Mojo, your the one that has many bad arguments, because why? The way you were raised in school is the problem. You are a slave to what you been told, you been told with random definitions and tight definition defending, and you been told about "free will" and lies that makes no sense, you been told that "People are not allowed to argue back", you been told that many bad, cookie cutter crap. You even been told that everything you do is "perfect" when your not. Do you really think your right all the time, perfect, etc? Your not. And you don't seem to be respectful towards opinions. Why? Because whenever someone disagrees with you, you just call them names, low cut-replies, etc, etc.. I mean YES, you can disagree, but you have to realize that if you do, you either ignore it, or actually argue with good credible talks. But you don't. What you do on here Mojo, is just like me. You tell people how to think, just like I do. Everyone does, but that's what everyone does.. Moral debates, non-moral debates, etc etc.. This is the problem with you Mojo, or is part of it I mean.. And this may sound badly selfish but I believe me being home and learning about many debates, wikipedias, etc, etc, has made me free. I used to be a believer of what people said to me, and I learned about many possibilities (Like that nobody knows stuff), respectful, etc, etc. I learned that we should make people feel welcome, which is mainly why we should refrain from being way too loose with our opinions and be more tolerated. The way I think is always based off stuff around me and my self. The way you think Mojo, is only based off you. And I can tell because you decide how I live, etc, only based off your own desires of your own self. Even when I show the dictionary, show that people got upset by your stuff, and prove that your shit can effect people (Just like anyone), all you do, is claim that "I'm being bias, or made up", or all you do is call me stupid immature names, and act like I'm wrong without actually debating it

Journeyer Can't argue that MojoOmegaWolf? Of course you can't! Mojo still won't say sorry and he kind of sounds like a sadistic. He can't realize that he's been acting rude and delusional big time. Apparently from what I can gather, he supports 'Emotional Abuse' like you just said (Damn, did you just get on?) and he admits to being proud of it. Of course, since he won't take down that offensive stuff, then it's not really past now is it heh? List of the things MojoOmegaWolf did and that he is proud of: • - Comments on people's own article not intended towards him, and won't learn how that can cause negative results •-Insults the way you live •-Insults the way of how you grow up •-Makes petitions about you, deliberately asking people to take action against you •-Said very offensive shit saying that "nobody wants to hear your faith" (Nobody wants to hear his negative one heh??) •-Blames victims, and (optional) tells people about it •-Blames that you started everything when you just wanted to ask for nicer things •-Makes a lot of non-sense preaches and hypocritical junk: E.g. He doesn't want to be told how to be talked, but he does this you, including teh for stating an 'opinion' •-Calls people offensive names based off once more your beliefs about people learning just because of someone agreeing •-Always claim that your supports are "you" whenever someone agrees with you •-Supports sadism •-Insults the way of how you care •-etc This is your flaws MojoOmegaWolf and I'm sure there is more.

DancingHumphrey Despite that some people will think I'm you, I'm surprised Mojo can't understand what he did was 'wrong'. The problem is that he thinks it's that "I'm telling him how to think" even though he does it too, and that EVERYONE does this. When 'you' naturally argue (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument), 'you' are automatically telling those how to "think". Even saying 2+6=8 to a person who think it's 7, counts. Saying, "Don't kill people" counts, etc, etc.. And all I said was 'Please be more nice" or similar. Which also counts.. And that includes Mojo's comments about me, telling teh to stay off wall (I think), etc, etc. I think the problem with him is that he hates me, and doesn't want to admit to anything he's done just because the person he hates (me) doesn't want to be "told", even though his stuff contain arguable events and about other people. Or he seems to think that everything he said "can't" be argued or at least will try to defend every little thing he does because he's just a god damn monster. Many things he claims are about world-debates, and every time he thinks he's "perfect" or that he disagrees with me because I'm me, that means he's avoiding the real world. I even give out the dictionary of many things and he claims I "Make stuff up" even though Mojo obviously does that. I actually argue with many observations and based off study. All he does is use random fancy words without actual credibility and sources with his claims. Ignoring the dictionary from the real world and saying it's "wrong" sounds more made up.. Wow. Also, he called my 'effects' theory bias, but he couldn't prove how they were "bias". And of course, people hate seeing this on here, but like I said if your not MojoOmegaWolf and you don't want to be part of the debate, then don't be part of it.

DancingHumphrey I wonder if I should just simply bring him out on DA more, and allow people to think about this.. I mean people who know how to argue. Not those REM trolls who depends on 'Why', 'What', etc, etc. who said, stop being obsessed (Ignoring the argument).