I think the titolo gives it away a bit, but I quite frankly do not care.
Something I have been noticing lately is the lack of criticism in commenti of art. Usually, everyone will give a generic compliment like awesome and cool, y'know, things that aren't very specific. Gradually, this is pissing me off, and for several reasons as well.
It is not constructive at all:
Listen, I would understand if it was something that is very good where te cannot find any sort of fault, but that's only in Seuris's art. If te genuinely find it to be perfectly executed, then go ahead and give it a generic and positive statement, but if te do not, then te need to give that person your opinion and what they need to work on with their art and how they could do it. That, my children, is called constructive criticism. It is essential to artists to improve on their art. it applies to nearly everything as well. If te think 2 + 2 = 5, te will think that until the end of time unless someone goes up and tells te it's actually 6. Same thing with art.
It is not very interesting to read because of lack of detail:
If te find a specific area o an effect the artist used that te quite enjoy, incorporate that into your opinion and commento on it. It's plain and quite quotidian to most artists if you're just like dude, liek dis iz ballin'. That's just fucking boring.
It shows you're not sincere with your actual intentions:
Saying something is just kewl shows to the artist te don't really care about the work, even if that's not what te truly feel. Seeming apathetic is a good thing to avoid.
It shows te have a lack of appreciation for better words:
Okay, this is just me being a glossophiliac, but at least using words with più syllables and that are used less will make te seem a bit più sophisticated and complessivamente, generale less of a mainstream moron.
An example I can think of is one shown link. As a artist deemed good da the community, te would think Danni would have something più to say other than that. At least maybe something about the over-spacing. My commenti involves my opinion, involving negativity mainly, but better to criticise than generically compliment. Granted, I did not give any advice, but it's mainly due to I have no experience drawing at all digitally, and barely traditionally. Danni, however, has very much experience and could've added a bit more, don't te think?
I do not understand why artists don't help other artists too much with their works. There are some who actually to critique, but most just generically compliment, thinking their actually helping that artist. For example, as a writer, I make sure to point out misspellings, organization and complessivamente, generale originality. Basically, If te know they can do better, then tell them. te don't need to give them a paragraph, either. Just a sentence o two could get your point across pretty well and will help them become better artists.
Also: Just because they're drawing and not recolouring, doesn't mean they deserve to not be dato constructive criticism on their work. Don't even set recolouring to an unacceptable standard, it doesn't even belong on the scale.
I will conclude with this final message: successivo time te find some art te see problems with, point it out in a respectable manner and if te can, tell them how they can improve on it. You'll make a community of better artists and complessivamente, generale making the community better.
Something I have been noticing lately is the lack of criticism in commenti of art. Usually, everyone will give a generic compliment like awesome and cool, y'know, things that aren't very specific. Gradually, this is pissing me off, and for several reasons as well.
It is not constructive at all:
Listen, I would understand if it was something that is very good where te cannot find any sort of fault, but that's only in Seuris's art. If te genuinely find it to be perfectly executed, then go ahead and give it a generic and positive statement, but if te do not, then te need to give that person your opinion and what they need to work on with their art and how they could do it. That, my children, is called constructive criticism. It is essential to artists to improve on their art. it applies to nearly everything as well. If te think 2 + 2 = 5, te will think that until the end of time unless someone goes up and tells te it's actually 6. Same thing with art.
It is not very interesting to read because of lack of detail:
If te find a specific area o an effect the artist used that te quite enjoy, incorporate that into your opinion and commento on it. It's plain and quite quotidian to most artists if you're just like dude, liek dis iz ballin'. That's just fucking boring.
It shows you're not sincere with your actual intentions:
Saying something is just kewl shows to the artist te don't really care about the work, even if that's not what te truly feel. Seeming apathetic is a good thing to avoid.
It shows te have a lack of appreciation for better words:
Okay, this is just me being a glossophiliac, but at least using words with più syllables and that are used less will make te seem a bit più sophisticated and complessivamente, generale less of a mainstream moron.
An example I can think of is one shown link. As a artist deemed good da the community, te would think Danni would have something più to say other than that. At least maybe something about the over-spacing. My commenti involves my opinion, involving negativity mainly, but better to criticise than generically compliment. Granted, I did not give any advice, but it's mainly due to I have no experience drawing at all digitally, and barely traditionally. Danni, however, has very much experience and could've added a bit more, don't te think?
I do not understand why artists don't help other artists too much with their works. There are some who actually to critique, but most just generically compliment, thinking their actually helping that artist. For example, as a writer, I make sure to point out misspellings, organization and complessivamente, generale originality. Basically, If te know they can do better, then tell them. te don't need to give them a paragraph, either. Just a sentence o two could get your point across pretty well and will help them become better artists.
Also: Just because they're drawing and not recolouring, doesn't mean they deserve to not be dato constructive criticism on their work. Don't even set recolouring to an unacceptable standard, it doesn't even belong on the scale.
I will conclude with this final message: successivo time te find some art te see problems with, point it out in a respectable manner and if te can, tell them how they can improve on it. You'll make a community of better artists and complessivamente, generale making the community better.
Name: slicer
Race: wolf
Sex: male
Age: 20
Aligment: hero
Powers: aura, and speed
speed: with sword 400-700mhp, with out sword 700-1000mhp.
fighting style: he fights with a 900lb sword with a combo of speed and aura.
Attack and special:
Signature: aura force, aura blast, aura exploshin
aura cool down time 1 to 3 hours
Specials: aura sences, aura boost, aura sheal, healing aura, and his hiden power call chaos summons it use three chaos emeralds to let slicer go super and only works when he is in danger
Commend attacks: spin blade, speed blade, dash blade, homeing blade, aura spin dash, aura dash punch, aura slash, speed punch, speed kick, speed slash, claw Slash and combo attacks
Chaos power:
3 emerald-super form
7 emerald-chaos form (note this is his hyper form)
7 emeralds+master emerald-nova form (note this is a new form that goes beyone the hyper form)
Race: wolf
Sex: male
Age: 20
Aligment: hero
Powers: aura, and speed
speed: with sword 400-700mhp, with out sword 700-1000mhp.
fighting style: he fights with a 900lb sword with a combo of speed and aura.
Attack and special:
Signature: aura force, aura blast, aura exploshin
aura cool down time 1 to 3 hours
Specials: aura sences, aura boost, aura sheal, healing aura, and his hiden power call chaos summons it use three chaos emeralds to let slicer go super and only works when he is in danger
Commend attacks: spin blade, speed blade, dash blade, homeing blade, aura spin dash, aura dash punch, aura slash, speed punch, speed kick, speed slash, claw Slash and combo attacks
Chaos power:
3 emerald-super form
7 emerald-chaos form (note this is his hyper form)
7 emeralds+master emerald-nova form (note this is a new form that goes beyone the hyper form)
Tell me if te see MS qualities in this new character.
Name-Festus Pyre
Age-28
Birth date-796 6CE*(1996)
*aging increased due to interdimensional travel*
Birthplace- San Fransisco, California
Eyes- brown
Hair- red
FATAL FLAWS-
is considered an outcast. Has ADHD and can rarely focus, and has shattered personalities due to a car crash when he was young.
Talents-
none of relevance to society. Can smith metal, but is mediocre at best.
Friends-
his only friend died in the car crash aforementioned.
Enemies-
most of the school. Most notable are the snooty twins "Maryland and Danithan Suella" the two have supposedly nothing wrong with their life.
Family- adoptive parent Robyn Nera. Did I mention the car crash? It was bad.
Other Notes- has created a fantasy world called "Nimea", often wishes it was true. Has suspicions, but cannot prove it. Robyn is very lazy and forces him to do everything for her. His old family was abusive too.
DID taco MAKE GARY SUE?
TELL MEEEE!
Name-Festus Pyre
Age-28
Birth date-796 6CE*(1996)
*aging increased due to interdimensional travel*
Birthplace- San Fransisco, California
Eyes- brown
Hair- red
FATAL FLAWS-
is considered an outcast. Has ADHD and can rarely focus, and has shattered personalities due to a car crash when he was young.
Talents-
none of relevance to society. Can smith metal, but is mediocre at best.
Friends-
his only friend died in the car crash aforementioned.
Enemies-
most of the school. Most notable are the snooty twins "Maryland and Danithan Suella" the two have supposedly nothing wrong with their life.
Family- adoptive parent Robyn Nera. Did I mention the car crash? It was bad.
Other Notes- has created a fantasy world called "Nimea", often wishes it was true. Has suspicions, but cannot prove it. Robyn is very lazy and forces him to do everything for her. His old family was abusive too.
DID taco MAKE GARY SUE?
TELL MEEEE!