|
AlexRose123 said:
lol sorry guys, i might go into a bit of a mini-rant here (: well tbh, after like 8 years of the Film coming out and being not nearly as good as the books, i dont know why i expected this one to be any different. it missed out so much vital information, like the fact that snape was the one who sent harry's parents to their deaths - how are they going to explain why snape came to the good side after they were killed? also, there were only 3 memories, and i was quite looking inoltrare, avanti to the one where they meet marvolo gaunt, but they cut it out, so how do they explain the ring, and the cup that harry is supposed to go after? it was almost as if the sub-plots of the romances between harry and ginny and ron and hermione were più important than the actual story line - telling harry about the horcruxes. i also felt that the true depth of dumbledore's relationship with harry wasnt conveyed enough - they had about 4 scenes together in the film. also, so much was just made up out of the blue! like the burrow setting on fuoco - clearly just an excuse for ginny to run out and try to protect harry. and bill and greyback, whats gonna happen about that exactly? lupin and tonks, why were they already together, when they werent meant to become a couple until dumbledores funeral (also missed out, tragically)? but the battle scene is most disappointing, it was so exciting in the book, i almost felt proud of the DA and the Order uniting to fight the death eaters, but instead they just strolled out of the castle, and the duel between snape and harry was poorly done, almost skipped over completely. there was so much wrong with the film, and although it had good moments of humour and was emotional and scary in some parts, the recitazione seems to have become wooden apart from the following; ron, snape, mcgonagall, dumbledore (to an extent) and malfoy. i just cant stand the way they ruin the memory of the books.
|
|