Harry Potter

rispondi a questa domanda

Harry Potter Domanda

Have te ever wondered what the libri would be like..

If Ravenclaw was the main house in the story? I'd like to think it wouldn't take 7 years for the characters to figure out how to beat Voldemort.And there would be a lot più intelligent Citazioni to ponder about
 HotshotChick posted più di un anno fa
next question »

Harry Potter Risposte

MrsEmmaPeel said:
No, I never wondered that before. I do agree that there would be più intelligent Citazioni in the story and that it wouldn't have taken so long for them to figure out how to beat Voldemort.
 select as best answer
posted più di un anno fa 
Kylie90210 said:
I disagree, because Dumbledore was the one who told them how to do it, pretty much, and I don't think anyone else could have figured it out. It was Dumbledore's history with Tom that led him to it, not intelligence. Plus, would a Ravenclaw have had the courage to actually duel Voldemort? Maybe, maybe not.
 select as best answer
posted più di un anno fa 
*
Ravenclaws can be Ribelle - The Brave but not foolhardy Ribelle - The Brave like many gryffindors
HotshotChick posted più di un anno fa
*
I can imagine a Ravenclaw sorted Harry analyzing and thinking problems through rather recitazione first and jumping in to potentially dangerous situations
HotshotChick posted più di un anno fa
*
I think most Ravenclaws are brave, it's just that they pick their battles più carefully than a Gryffindor would. Harry was Ribelle - The Brave but he was also a bit stupid, always rushing off and getting himself into trouble because he didn't take the time to think first. If it weren't for Hermione (who really had più Ravenclaw tendencies than anything else) constantly talking sense into him, he probably would have died long before the seventh book from pure impetuous idiocy. I gotta say though, even though I'm a Ravenclaw, the libri just wouldn't be as fun if they weren't from a Gryffindor POV. Harry's constant leaping before looking, while sometimes extremely frustrating, was was also very entertaining :D
xElvenPiratex posted più di un anno fa
BlackHound said:
Never once.

So te would rather have had the story only last five years? o only three? What would the point have been to any of it? A Slytherin/Ravenclaw rivalry really doesn't interest me nearly as much as the Slytherin/Gryffindor rivalry does. It's a "brains vs. brawn" thing, not a "brains vs. brains" thing...and I just can't see a Ravenclaw Lily, James, Remus and Peter, and it's the Sword of Godric Gryffindor, not the Sword of Rowena Ravenclaw. ;)
 select as best answer
posted più di un anno fa 
*
Slytherins aren't defined da intelligence like Ravenclaws many slytherins such as Crabbe, Goyle, and Pansy aren't that and I think Slytherin/Ravenclaw rivalry would be interesting because generally Ravenclaws are open minded whereas many Slytherins are not plus Slytherins use cunning means to achieve their ends while Ravenclaws use creativity
HotshotChick posted più di un anno fa
*
te asked for opinions, so I gave mine. ;) "Well, if you'd rather be brawny than brainy..." quote from Severus Snape on the Hogwarts Express, upon meeting James and Sirius for the first time.
BlackHound posted più di un anno fa
next question »
Cookies help us bring you Fanpop. By using Fanpop, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More Got It!